What's new

Welcome

If you already have an account, please login, but if you don't have one yet, you are more than welcome to freely join the community of lawyers around the world..

Register Log in
  • We don't have any responsibilities about the news being sent in this site. Legal News are automatically being collected from sources and submitted in this forum by feed readers. Source of each news is set in the news and a link to its source is always added.
    (Any News older than 21 days from its post time will be deleted automatically!)

Jurist UN rights expert urges rejection of France bill presuming legality of lethal force by police officers

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • Thread starter
  • Staff
  • #1

Dadparvar

Staff member
Nov 11, 2016
11,077
0
6
A UN expert on Wednesday called on the French government to throw out a bill that operates on the presumption that police officers who utilize firearms are acting within the scope of their duties unless evidence proves otherwise, a decision that could legitimize and normalize violence against civilians.

In commenting on the potential consequences if this bill successfully passes and becomes law, Morris Tidball-Binz, UN Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions stated:

The duty to investigate every potentially unlawful killing rests with the State…It cannot be displaced, in law or in practice, by requiring victims or their families to rebut a legal presumption that the use of potentially lethal force was lawful before the facts have been independently established.
Draft bill 691, which establishes the presumption of lawful shooting for authorities using their weapons was passed in its first reading by the French National Assembly, and it now heads to the Senate, which is the upper house of the French Parliament. In one of its earlier drafts, the wording of the bill was drafted as a “presumption of self-defense” under the Penal Code, but later it was rewritten to modify the Code of Security. Having been approved by 313 votes to 199 at the most recent reading of the bill, its supporters largely say that by giving enforcement officers the benefit of the doubt in shooting cases, it protects them from unnecessary criminal liability.

On the other hand, critics have stated if passed, the new legal presumption shifts the burden of proof and requires victims’ families and prosecutors to actively prove that a shooting was neither proportionate nor necessary. This in turn could grant officers institutional impunity, which could lead to an increase in fatal shootings and a decline in public trust. Additionally, Tidball-Binz pointed out that placing whole reliance on evidence to rebut the presumption slows down the entire judicial process.

France, which has one of the highest rates of fatal shootings by police officers in Europe, has drawn global outrage in recent years due to the disproportionate number of killings that have affected primarily Black and minority communities. For instance, the 2023 murder of teenager Nahel Merzouk by officers illustrated how the unregulated usage of firearms harms communities, and this effect will only be exacerbated by the passing of this law, Tidball-Binz says.

If adopted into law, Tidball-Binz claims the bill would violate Principle 9 of the UN Basic Principles on the Use of Force and Firearms by Law Enforcement Officials which mandates strict limits on the use of lethal force.

The post UN rights expert urges rejection of France bill presuming legality of lethal force by police officers appeared first on JURIST - News.

Continue reading...

Note: We don't have any responsibilities about this news. Its been posted here by Feed Reader and we had no controls and checking on it. And because News posted here will be deleted automatically after 21 days, threads are closed so that no one spend time to post and discuss here. You can always check the source and discuss in their site.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top