- Thread starter
- Staff
- #1
Dadparvar
Staff member
- Nov 11, 2016
- 9,658
- 0
- 6
The UN expressed criticism of the Maldives Parliament’s dismissal of two judges from the Supreme Court on Monday, claiming that the government’s recent anti-corruption investigations targeted at Supreme Court judges threaten the independence of the judiciary.
The UN cited the timing of the investigations that led to the dismissal of judges Azmiralda and Mahaz, which commenced soon after a constitutional challenge was launched against the government, as evidence that the investigations were intended to prevent the Supreme Court from striking down a recent constitutional amendment that forces members of parliament to vote along party lines and restricts members from switching political parties.
The justices who were subject to investigation allege that they were now allowed to testify to defend themselves, and that Justice Azmiralda’s lawyer was not permitted to speak in her defence in the closed-door trials that led to the dismissals. If these allegations are true, this is a serious breach of due process, which ensures that the law is applied fairly.
This could set a troubling precedent that normalizes government intervention in the court system, which risks undermining the rule of law by making the court system ineffective at enforcing the law against the government.
The investigations were commenced after the government passed a law that reduced the number of Supreme Court justices from seven to five under the pretence of criminal investigations into judges Azmiralda, Mahaz, and Suood conducted by the Maldives Anti-Corruption Commission based on anonymous complaints.
The judges were accused of using their influence to secure the release of Justice Azmiralda’s husband after he was arrested, even though the first public evidence of direct communications between the judges and the criminal court responsible for Justice Azmiralda’s husband’s case was following his release.
In March, Justice Al Suood resigned in protest of the investigation.
The UN called for the Maldives to comply with international human rights obligations, which require an independent and effective judiciary to effectively protect human rights and equality before the law.
The post UN denounces Maldives government dismissal of Supreme Court justices appeared first on JURIST - News.
Continue reading...
Note: We don't have any responsibilities about this news. Its been posted here by Feed Reader and we had no controls and checking on it. And because News posted here will be deleted automatically after 21 days, threads are closed so that no one spend time to post and discuss here. You can always check the source and discuss in their site.
The UN cited the timing of the investigations that led to the dismissal of judges Azmiralda and Mahaz, which commenced soon after a constitutional challenge was launched against the government, as evidence that the investigations were intended to prevent the Supreme Court from striking down a recent constitutional amendment that forces members of parliament to vote along party lines and restricts members from switching political parties.
The justices who were subject to investigation allege that they were now allowed to testify to defend themselves, and that Justice Azmiralda’s lawyer was not permitted to speak in her defence in the closed-door trials that led to the dismissals. If these allegations are true, this is a serious breach of due process, which ensures that the law is applied fairly.
This could set a troubling precedent that normalizes government intervention in the court system, which risks undermining the rule of law by making the court system ineffective at enforcing the law against the government.
The investigations were commenced after the government passed a law that reduced the number of Supreme Court justices from seven to five under the pretence of criminal investigations into judges Azmiralda, Mahaz, and Suood conducted by the Maldives Anti-Corruption Commission based on anonymous complaints.
The judges were accused of using their influence to secure the release of Justice Azmiralda’s husband after he was arrested, even though the first public evidence of direct communications between the judges and the criminal court responsible for Justice Azmiralda’s husband’s case was following his release.
In March, Justice Al Suood resigned in protest of the investigation.
The UN called for the Maldives to comply with international human rights obligations, which require an independent and effective judiciary to effectively protect human rights and equality before the law.
The post UN denounces Maldives government dismissal of Supreme Court justices appeared first on JURIST - News.
Continue reading...
Note: We don't have any responsibilities about this news. Its been posted here by Feed Reader and we had no controls and checking on it. And because News posted here will be deleted automatically after 21 days, threads are closed so that no one spend time to post and discuss here. You can always check the source and discuss in their site.