- Thread starter
- Staff
- #1
Dadparvar
Staff member
- Nov 11, 2016
- 10,578
- 0
- 6
Amnesty International on Friday condemned Thailand’s charges against activist and conscientious objector Netiwit Chotiphatphaisal, who is facing trial on September 9 for refusing military conscription. The group demanded that Thailand drop all charges, warning that the prosecution is violating international human rights law. Netiwit, a former Amnesty International Thailand board member, risks three years in prison under Article 45 of the 1954 Military Conscription Act.
Montse Ferrer, Amnesty International’s regional research director, stressed that international law demands alternatives to compulsory military service for conscientious objectors. He stated: “Netiwit’s refusal to participate in this outdated system should urge Thai authorities to reform the country’s legal framework to allow alternative services, as required by international human rights law and standards.”
A report released by Amnesty International in 2020 exposed allegations of rampant violations during Thai military training. All 19 recent conscripts interviewed reported or witnessed physical beatings, including slaps, kicks, and assaults with sticks, boots, helmets, and gun butts.
Netiwit’s indictment stems from his refusal to participate in conscription on April 5 last year, an act of civil disobedience against a military long criticized for documented abuses. In a 2016 interview with War Resisters’ International (WRI), Netiwit condemned Thailand’s lack of provisions for conscientious objectors, the class-based evasion of the draft, and the mistreatment of transgender women during recruitment. He described conscription as an “attitude adjustment program” designed to enforce obedience.
Thailand’s conscription, mandated by Article 73 of the Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand 2007, requires men aged 21 to join the military through a lottery. According to the WRI, drawing a red card means two years of mandatory service. Refusing conscription can lead to three years in prison.
Article 18 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) protects freedom of thought, conscience, and religion. The UN Human Rights Committee’s General Comment 22 also affirms that conscientious objection to military service is part of these freedoms. While punishing objectors without offering alternatives violates international law, advocates warn that reform is long overdue in Thailand.
The post Thailand urged to drop charges against conscientious objector appeared first on JURIST - News.
Continue reading...
Note: We don't have any responsibilities about this news. Its been posted here by Feed Reader and we had no controls and checking on it. And because News posted here will be deleted automatically after 21 days, threads are closed so that no one spend time to post and discuss here. You can always check the source and discuss in their site.
Montse Ferrer, Amnesty International’s regional research director, stressed that international law demands alternatives to compulsory military service for conscientious objectors. He stated: “Netiwit’s refusal to participate in this outdated system should urge Thai authorities to reform the country’s legal framework to allow alternative services, as required by international human rights law and standards.”
A report released by Amnesty International in 2020 exposed allegations of rampant violations during Thai military training. All 19 recent conscripts interviewed reported or witnessed physical beatings, including slaps, kicks, and assaults with sticks, boots, helmets, and gun butts.
Netiwit’s indictment stems from his refusal to participate in conscription on April 5 last year, an act of civil disobedience against a military long criticized for documented abuses. In a 2016 interview with War Resisters’ International (WRI), Netiwit condemned Thailand’s lack of provisions for conscientious objectors, the class-based evasion of the draft, and the mistreatment of transgender women during recruitment. He described conscription as an “attitude adjustment program” designed to enforce obedience.
Thailand’s conscription, mandated by Article 73 of the Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand 2007, requires men aged 21 to join the military through a lottery. According to the WRI, drawing a red card means two years of mandatory service. Refusing conscription can lead to three years in prison.
Article 18 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) protects freedom of thought, conscience, and religion. The UN Human Rights Committee’s General Comment 22 also affirms that conscientious objection to military service is part of these freedoms. While punishing objectors without offering alternatives violates international law, advocates warn that reform is long overdue in Thailand.
The post Thailand urged to drop charges against conscientious objector appeared first on JURIST - News.
Continue reading...
Note: We don't have any responsibilities about this news. Its been posted here by Feed Reader and we had no controls and checking on it. And because News posted here will be deleted automatically after 21 days, threads are closed so that no one spend time to post and discuss here. You can always check the source and discuss in their site.