What's new

Welcome

If you already have an account, please login, but if you don't have one yet, you are more than welcome to freely join the community of lawyers around the world..

Register Log in
  • We don't have any responsibilities about the news being sent in this site. Legal News are automatically being collected from sources and submitted in this forum by feed readers. Source of each news is set in the news and a link to its source is always added.
    (Any News older than 21 days from its post time will be deleted automatically!)

Jurist Rights group criticizes FIFA for continuing to permit Israeli clubs’ participation

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • Thread starter
  • Staff
  • #1

Dadparvar

Staff member
Nov 11, 2016
10,735
0
6
Amnesty International on Friday said that FIFA’s refusal to take action against the Israeli Football Association (IFA) over club participation based in illegal Israeli settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT) flouts international law.

In October 2024 FIFA accepted a Palestinian Football Association (PFA) petition to investigate alleged human rights violations and discrimination within the IFA. Following the investigation, FIFA on Thursday issued a fine against the IFA of 150,000 Swiss Francs ($190,700 USD). FIFA found that the IFA failed to take meaningful action against persistent and well-documented racist behavior.

FIFA did not accept the PFA’s proposal to suspend the IFA , stating that the “legal status of the West Bank remains an unresolved and highly complex matter under public international law.”

Steve Cockburn, Head of Economic and Social Justice at Amnesty International stated:

By continuing to condone the presence of clubs based in illegal settlements in the OPT in Israel’s league, the Israeli Football Association is indirectly legitimizing Israel’s unlawful occupation and its severe human rights violations against Palestinians, including the crime against humanity of apartheid. FIFA must not continue to ignore the International Court of Justice’s 2024 Advisory Opinion. FIFA has an unequivocal responsibility to act. It must also ensure full transparency and publish the legal advice FIFA received on this matter and provide the full rationale for its unjust decision.
The Israeli occupation of the OPT, which includes the West Bank, has been declared illegal by the UN’s highest court, the International Court of Justice (ICJ). In July 2024, the ICJ ruled in an advisory opinion that the continued Israeli occupation of Palestinian territories is unlawful. In the opinion, the court stated that Israel must “cease immediately all new settlement activities, and…evacuate all settlers from the Occupied Palestinian Territories.”

FIFA has a history of suspending clubs from participation due to violations of international law. On February 28th, 2022, four days after the start of Russia’s “Special Military Operation” in Ukraine, FIFA suspended all Russian teams from participation in FIFA competitions until further notice. The FIFA statement pledged that “football is fully united here and in full solidarity with all the people affected in Ukraine.” The Court of Arbitration for Sport refused Russia’s request to end FIFA’s suspension of Russian teams in March 2022.

According to Amnesty International, there are at least six football clubs based in the OPT currently playing games in Israeli leagues. Article 64.2 of FIFA’s statutes states that “member associations and their clubs may not play on the territory of another member association without the latter’s approval.”

The post Rights group criticizes FIFA for continuing to permit Israeli clubs’ participation appeared first on JURIST - News.

Continue reading...

Note: We don't have any responsibilities about this news. Its been posted here by Feed Reader and we had no controls and checking on it. And because News posted here will be deleted automatically after 21 days, threads are closed so that no one spend time to post and discuss here. You can always check the source and discuss in their site.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top