- Thread starter
- Staff
- #1
Dadparvar
Staff member
- Nov 11, 2016
- 10,717
- 0
- 6
Several Malian individuals have sued seven American chocolate companies for abetting and supporting illegal child labor in Côte D’Ivoire.
The plaintiffs are former child slaves who were trafficked from Mali to harvest cocoa beans in Côte D’Ivoire. They escaped the plantation and returned to Mali. As laborers, the children are not paid and are constantly subjected to physical abuse by farmers or traffickers. As there are no laws in Mali to aid the plaintiffs in seeking damages or civil remedies against foreign exporters, they brought their claims under US law, specifically the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act and the Alien Torts Statute.
The defendant companies are Barry Callebaut, Cargill, Hershey, Mars, Mondelēz, Nestlé, and Olam. In 2001, they signed an international agreement called the Harkin-Engel Protocol. It is the chocolate industry’s pledge to reduce child labor in Ghana and Côte D’Ivoire. The suit alleges that these companies have been falsely purporting to be forwarding humanitarian initiatives while working with syndicates within Côte D’Ivoire to secretly continue producing cocoa using child labor. The complaint raises statistics from the National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago showing that the number of enslaved child laborers working in Côte d’Ivoire and Ghana have gradually increased to reach over 1.56 million, implying the efforts purported to have been made by the defendants were bogus misrepresentation.
The suit also states that the companies have violated the International Labour Organization Convention No. 182 that was ratified by the US in 1999. The convention imposes a minimum age requirement and prohibits laborers from working in hazardous conditions. Child laborers are forced to use toxic pesticides and machetes without any protective equipment on a daily basis.
International Rights Advocates (IRAdvocates), the organization representing the plaintiffs, has also filed a separate suit under the Alien Torts Statute that grants US courts jurisdiction for claims brought by a foreign national. Terry Collingsworth, Executive Director of IRAdvocates, stated:
Several of the companies have declined to comment on the pending litigation. Nestlé stated that the companies have internal policies to prevent child labor, and that the lawsuit does not help progress global efforts to combat the exploitative practice. Cargill declined to make any specific comments but affirmed that it has no-tolerance policies for child labor.
The post Mali former trafficked child laborers sue multinational chocolate companies appeared first on JURIST - News - Legal News & Commentary.
Continue reading...
Note: We don't have any responsibilities about this news. Its been posted here by Feed Reader and we had no controls and checking on it. And because News posted here will be deleted automatically after 21 days, threads are closed so that no one spend time to post and discuss here. You can always check the source and discuss in their site.
The plaintiffs are former child slaves who were trafficked from Mali to harvest cocoa beans in Côte D’Ivoire. They escaped the plantation and returned to Mali. As laborers, the children are not paid and are constantly subjected to physical abuse by farmers or traffickers. As there are no laws in Mali to aid the plaintiffs in seeking damages or civil remedies against foreign exporters, they brought their claims under US law, specifically the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act and the Alien Torts Statute.
The defendant companies are Barry Callebaut, Cargill, Hershey, Mars, Mondelēz, Nestlé, and Olam. In 2001, they signed an international agreement called the Harkin-Engel Protocol. It is the chocolate industry’s pledge to reduce child labor in Ghana and Côte D’Ivoire. The suit alleges that these companies have been falsely purporting to be forwarding humanitarian initiatives while working with syndicates within Côte D’Ivoire to secretly continue producing cocoa using child labor. The complaint raises statistics from the National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago showing that the number of enslaved child laborers working in Côte d’Ivoire and Ghana have gradually increased to reach over 1.56 million, implying the efforts purported to have been made by the defendants were bogus misrepresentation.
The suit also states that the companies have violated the International Labour Organization Convention No. 182 that was ratified by the US in 1999. The convention imposes a minimum age requirement and prohibits laborers from working in hazardous conditions. Child laborers are forced to use toxic pesticides and machetes without any protective equipment on a daily basis.
International Rights Advocates (IRAdvocates), the organization representing the plaintiffs, has also filed a separate suit under the Alien Torts Statute that grants US courts jurisdiction for claims brought by a foreign national. Terry Collingsworth, Executive Director of IRAdvocates, stated:
Several of the companies have declined to comment on the pending litigation. Nestlé stated that the companies have internal policies to prevent child labor, and that the lawsuit does not help progress global efforts to combat the exploitative practice. Cargill declined to make any specific comments but affirmed that it has no-tolerance policies for child labor.
The post Mali former trafficked child laborers sue multinational chocolate companies appeared first on JURIST - News - Legal News & Commentary.
Continue reading...
Note: We don't have any responsibilities about this news. Its been posted here by Feed Reader and we had no controls and checking on it. And because News posted here will be deleted automatically after 21 days, threads are closed so that no one spend time to post and discuss here. You can always check the source and discuss in their site.