- Thread starter
- Staff
- #1
Dadparvar
Staff member
- Nov 11, 2016
- 10,595
- 0
- 6
The Irish High Court ruled Friday that a decision made by the country’s Minister for Justice in 2020 to declare the UK a “safe country” to send asylum seekers back to during processing was “unlawful as a matter of EU law.”
The decision came after two individuals’ applications for international protection in Ireland were rejected because of their connections with the UK, which is attempting to adopt a plan to send asylum seekers to Rwanda while their applications are being reviewed. The initiative has been overruled by the UK Supreme Court on the grounds that Rwanda is not a safe country to send asylum seekers to. After the ruling, the UK Parliament attempted to bypass the court’s decision by issuing the Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill.
The Ireland High Court argued that since the UK is willing to turn its asylum seekers back to Rwanda, which Ireland hasn’t designated to be a safe country, the 2020 decision by the Minister for Justice was in breach of the principle of refoulment, which states that no asylum seeker should be turned back to a country where their basic rights would be in risk of violation.
The UK has yet to respond to the ruling.
The post Ireland High Court rules UK not safe for asylum applicants due to Rwanda plan appeared first on JURIST - News.
Continue reading...
Note: We don't have any responsibilities about this news. Its been posted here by Feed Reader and we had no controls and checking on it. And because News posted here will be deleted automatically after 21 days, threads are closed so that no one spend time to post and discuss here. You can always check the source and discuss in their site.
The decision came after two individuals’ applications for international protection in Ireland were rejected because of their connections with the UK, which is attempting to adopt a plan to send asylum seekers to Rwanda while their applications are being reviewed. The initiative has been overruled by the UK Supreme Court on the grounds that Rwanda is not a safe country to send asylum seekers to. After the ruling, the UK Parliament attempted to bypass the court’s decision by issuing the Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill.
The Ireland High Court argued that since the UK is willing to turn its asylum seekers back to Rwanda, which Ireland hasn’t designated to be a safe country, the 2020 decision by the Minister for Justice was in breach of the principle of refoulment, which states that no asylum seeker should be turned back to a country where their basic rights would be in risk of violation.
The UK has yet to respond to the ruling.
The post Ireland High Court rules UK not safe for asylum applicants due to Rwanda plan appeared first on JURIST - News.
Continue reading...
Note: We don't have any responsibilities about this news. Its been posted here by Feed Reader and we had no controls and checking on it. And because News posted here will be deleted automatically after 21 days, threads are closed so that no one spend time to post and discuss here. You can always check the source and discuss in their site.