- Thread starter
- Staff
- #1
Dadparvar
Staff member
- Nov 11, 2016
- 10,816
- 0
- 6
Human Rights Watch (HRW) on Monday reported that Israeli strikes on four Iranian oil depots put the health of civilians and the environment at risk and may constitute war crimes under international humanitarian law.
The group warned that the release of toxic pollutants may impose long-term effects on man-made and natural environments. HRW alerted to potential contamination and acidification of waterways and soil and increased risks of chronic respiratory and cardiovascular disease.
Israeli forces said the attack complied with international humanitarian law and claimed the strikes were limited to military objectives to disrupt Iranian army fuel supply lines. However, HRW later claimed that targeted depots were used for civilian purposes.
Israeli forces launched attacks on the oil depots surrounding Tehran on March 7, straining the country’s energy infrastructure and producing “black rain” from the release of toxic pollutants into the air. Iranians continue to face negative effects from pollution caused by the conflict.
After the attack–which came amidst a series of fights between Iran, Israel, and the US–the UN Environmental Program said the severity of environmental consequences from the conflict should trigger an immediate cessation of hostilities.
To prevent environmental harm, international humanitarian law mandates that countries engaged in armed conflict must follow certain principles to minimize civilian and environmental destruction, whether incidental or intentional.
Armed conflict rules include principles of distinction, precaution, and proportionality, which create protections for civilian property and populations. Distinction mandates that civilian property, including the natural environment, may not be attacked unless it is a military objective, while proportionality and precaution require that retaliatory military force must be proportional and feasible measures should be taken to minimize damage to humans and the environment.
Additionally, the laws of armed conflict under international law consider military objectives unlawful if they cause widespread, long-term, and severe damage to the natural environment. The principle is generally considered difficult to violate, as “widespread” and “severe” are high thresholds, and “long-term” only encompasses damage that lasts decades.
In order for such military force to be considered a war crime, HRW said national and military actors must demonstrate criminal intent. The group contended that Israel’s failure to account for the foreseeable, long-term environmental harm inflicted upon the area surrounding Tehran may establish such intent.
The post Group warns strikes on Iran oil depots may cause long-term environmental harm appeared first on JURIST - News.
Continue reading...
Note: We don't have any responsibilities about this news. Its been posted here by Feed Reader and we had no controls and checking on it. And because News posted here will be deleted automatically after 21 days, threads are closed so that no one spend time to post and discuss here. You can always check the source and discuss in their site.
The group warned that the release of toxic pollutants may impose long-term effects on man-made and natural environments. HRW alerted to potential contamination and acidification of waterways and soil and increased risks of chronic respiratory and cardiovascular disease.
Israeli forces said the attack complied with international humanitarian law and claimed the strikes were limited to military objectives to disrupt Iranian army fuel supply lines. However, HRW later claimed that targeted depots were used for civilian purposes.
Israeli forces launched attacks on the oil depots surrounding Tehran on March 7, straining the country’s energy infrastructure and producing “black rain” from the release of toxic pollutants into the air. Iranians continue to face negative effects from pollution caused by the conflict.
After the attack–which came amidst a series of fights between Iran, Israel, and the US–the UN Environmental Program said the severity of environmental consequences from the conflict should trigger an immediate cessation of hostilities.
To prevent environmental harm, international humanitarian law mandates that countries engaged in armed conflict must follow certain principles to minimize civilian and environmental destruction, whether incidental or intentional.
Armed conflict rules include principles of distinction, precaution, and proportionality, which create protections for civilian property and populations. Distinction mandates that civilian property, including the natural environment, may not be attacked unless it is a military objective, while proportionality and precaution require that retaliatory military force must be proportional and feasible measures should be taken to minimize damage to humans and the environment.
Additionally, the laws of armed conflict under international law consider military objectives unlawful if they cause widespread, long-term, and severe damage to the natural environment. The principle is generally considered difficult to violate, as “widespread” and “severe” are high thresholds, and “long-term” only encompasses damage that lasts decades.
In order for such military force to be considered a war crime, HRW said national and military actors must demonstrate criminal intent. The group contended that Israel’s failure to account for the foreseeable, long-term environmental harm inflicted upon the area surrounding Tehran may establish such intent.
The post Group warns strikes on Iran oil depots may cause long-term environmental harm appeared first on JURIST - News.
Continue reading...
Note: We don't have any responsibilities about this news. Its been posted here by Feed Reader and we had no controls and checking on it. And because News posted here will be deleted automatically after 21 days, threads are closed so that no one spend time to post and discuss here. You can always check the source and discuss in their site.