- Thread starter
- Staff
- #1
Dadparvar
Staff member
- Nov 11, 2016
- 10,963
- 0
- 6
The European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruled Tuesday that Malta’s system for appointing judges, which provides its prime minister with decisive power in the appointment of members of the judiciary, is not contrary to EU law.
The ruling by the court came after Repubblika, an association whose purpose is to promote the protection of justice and the rule of law in Malta, challenged the procedure for the appointment of members of the Maltese judiciary provided for by the Constitution of Malta in proceedings before the national courts.
Under the process provided by the Maltese Constitution, members of the judiciary are appointed by the president acting in accordance with the advice of the prime minister. Such an appointment would however have to satisfy certain conditions laid down by the constitution and would also be subject to vetting by the Judicial Appointments Committee, which is charged with assessing candidates and providing an opinion to the prime minister.
The national court then referred the matter to the ECJ, seeking clarifications as to whether the Maltese system for appointing members of the judiciary was within EU law. More specifically, the referral concerned the question as to whether the appointment process was consistent with Article 19(1) of the Treaty on European Union, read in light of Article 47 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, which provides that member states must provide litigants with sufficient remedies in order to ensure effective judicial protection in the fields covered by EU law.
The court, sitting as the Grand Chamber (a format reserved only for the most important cases), held:
In the current case, the court found that although the prime minister had a certain power in the appointment of members of the judiciary, the exercise of such a power was subject to the provisions of the Maltese Constitution and considerable legislative scrutiny. However, the court also held that such a power would only be valid so long as the prime minister exercised such powers “only in exceptional circumstances” and in “strict and effective compliance with the obligation to state reasons” so as to prevent the rise of legitimate doubts in relation to the independence of the candidates selected.
The post ECJ finds Malta judicial selection process valid under EU law appeared first on JURIST - News - Legal News & Commentary.
Continue reading...
Note: We don't have any responsibilities about this news. Its been posted here by Feed Reader and we had no controls and checking on it. And because News posted here will be deleted automatically after 21 days, threads are closed so that no one spend time to post and discuss here. You can always check the source and discuss in their site.
The ruling by the court came after Repubblika, an association whose purpose is to promote the protection of justice and the rule of law in Malta, challenged the procedure for the appointment of members of the Maltese judiciary provided for by the Constitution of Malta in proceedings before the national courts.
Under the process provided by the Maltese Constitution, members of the judiciary are appointed by the president acting in accordance with the advice of the prime minister. Such an appointment would however have to satisfy certain conditions laid down by the constitution and would also be subject to vetting by the Judicial Appointments Committee, which is charged with assessing candidates and providing an opinion to the prime minister.
The national court then referred the matter to the ECJ, seeking clarifications as to whether the Maltese system for appointing members of the judiciary was within EU law. More specifically, the referral concerned the question as to whether the appointment process was consistent with Article 19(1) of the Treaty on European Union, read in light of Article 47 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, which provides that member states must provide litigants with sufficient remedies in order to ensure effective judicial protection in the fields covered by EU law.
The court, sitting as the Grand Chamber (a format reserved only for the most important cases), held:
The court reached this conclusion by first holding that under EU law, the guarantees of judicial independence and impartiality require the existence of rules that would dispel any reasonable doubt in the minds of individuals in relation to the imperviousness of members of the judiciary to external factors such as influence from the legislature or the executive.
In the current case, the court found that although the prime minister had a certain power in the appointment of members of the judiciary, the exercise of such a power was subject to the provisions of the Maltese Constitution and considerable legislative scrutiny. However, the court also held that such a power would only be valid so long as the prime minister exercised such powers “only in exceptional circumstances” and in “strict and effective compliance with the obligation to state reasons” so as to prevent the rise of legitimate doubts in relation to the independence of the candidates selected.
The post ECJ finds Malta judicial selection process valid under EU law appeared first on JURIST - News - Legal News & Commentary.
Continue reading...
Note: We don't have any responsibilities about this news. Its been posted here by Feed Reader and we had no controls and checking on it. And because News posted here will be deleted automatically after 21 days, threads are closed so that no one spend time to post and discuss here. You can always check the source and discuss in their site.