- Thread starter
- Staff
- #1
Dadparvar
Staff member
- Nov 11, 2016
- 10,905
- 0
- 6
Alberta Premier Danielle Smith announced Thursday that the government will ask voters in a fall referendum whether the province should remain in Canada. The announcement comes after a provincial court twice quashed a citizen-initiated independence petition over concerns that First Nations were not properly consulted.
The scheduled October provincial referendum will ask Albertan voters if they support greater provincial control over immigration and constitutional matters. In addition to the original nine, a newly added question asks:
Additionally, Smith said in her province-wide address that she is “deeply troubled by an erroneous court decision that interfered with the democratic rights of hundreds of thousands of Albertans.” She added that Albertans’ voices deserve to be heard, even if she personally supports Alberta remaining in Canada.
Calling for a stop to the referendum, the Athabasca Chipewyan First Nations urged the provincial government to respect Treaty rights, Indigenous mobility and the rule of law. In a statement issued Thursday, Chief Allan Adam added: “The Government of Alberta cannot simply ignore the Constitution, ignore Treaty rights, and ignore the courts because it finds those obligations inconvenient. Cabinet is not above the law.”
On May 13, Justice Shaina Leonard held that the provincial government must consult the First Nations before approving the independence petition. According to her, the duty arises because a legally-binding referendum result has potential adverse effects on Aboriginal and treaty rights. Smith plans to appeal this decision.
Earlier in January, Justice Colin Feasby for the same court quashed the independence petition because it does not guarantee Albertans’ constitutional rights to the same extent as the Constitution Act, 1982. The provincial legislature removed the requirement that a referendum proposal be constitutionally compliant. Elections Alberta then allowed the independence petition to move forward despite the ruling.
The post Alberta to vote on whether to initiate independence referendum after adverse court rulings appeared first on JURIST - News.
Continue reading...
Note: We don't have any responsibilities about this news. Its been posted here by Feed Reader and we had no controls and checking on it. And because News posted here will be deleted automatically after 21 days, threads are closed so that no one spend time to post and discuss here. You can always check the source and discuss in their site.
The scheduled October provincial referendum will ask Albertan voters if they support greater provincial control over immigration and constitutional matters. In addition to the original nine, a newly added question asks:
Smith said that given the formulation of the question, the result of the referendum would not confer on the government a binding obligation to realize the province’s independence. As a result, the government does not owe a duty to consult the First Nations. She maintained that the previous court ruling does not apply to this new question in the upcoming referendum.
Additionally, Smith said in her province-wide address that she is “deeply troubled by an erroneous court decision that interfered with the democratic rights of hundreds of thousands of Albertans.” She added that Albertans’ voices deserve to be heard, even if she personally supports Alberta remaining in Canada.
Calling for a stop to the referendum, the Athabasca Chipewyan First Nations urged the provincial government to respect Treaty rights, Indigenous mobility and the rule of law. In a statement issued Thursday, Chief Allan Adam added: “The Government of Alberta cannot simply ignore the Constitution, ignore Treaty rights, and ignore the courts because it finds those obligations inconvenient. Cabinet is not above the law.”
On May 13, Justice Shaina Leonard held that the provincial government must consult the First Nations before approving the independence petition. According to her, the duty arises because a legally-binding referendum result has potential adverse effects on Aboriginal and treaty rights. Smith plans to appeal this decision.
Earlier in January, Justice Colin Feasby for the same court quashed the independence petition because it does not guarantee Albertans’ constitutional rights to the same extent as the Constitution Act, 1982. The provincial legislature removed the requirement that a referendum proposal be constitutionally compliant. Elections Alberta then allowed the independence petition to move forward despite the ruling.
The post Alberta to vote on whether to initiate independence referendum after adverse court rulings appeared first on JURIST - News.
Continue reading...
Note: We don't have any responsibilities about this news. Its been posted here by Feed Reader and we had no controls and checking on it. And because News posted here will be deleted automatically after 21 days, threads are closed so that no one spend time to post and discuss here. You can always check the source and discuss in their site.