- Thread starter
- Staff
- #1
Dadparvar
Staff member
- Nov 11, 2016
- 9,647
- 0
- 6
A UN expert Wednesday reprimanded Brazil’s adoption of a controversial legal doctrine to limit the Indigenous People’s land rights.
UN Special Rapporteur on the rights of Indigenous Peoples Albert Kwokwo Barume reported that Brazil’s Senate has approved legislative decree No. 717/2024, which could “revoke the legal foundation for Indigenous land demarcation and annul the demarcation of” two Indigenous territories in Santa Catarina. The decree will suspend fundamental protections for indigenous land rights set out in previously established policy.
The legal basis for the decree is Law 14.701/2023, which sets out the “Marco Temporal Doctrine.” The doctrine “is a legal thesis…that sets a historical cutoff date for recognizing and validating indigenous land claims.” In 2023, the Supreme Federal Court ruled that the legal practice was unconstitutional. However, three months later Law 14.701/2023 reinstated the doctrine.
Greenpeace activists have castigated the legal method, stating:
Barume stressed the grave human rights impact that the doctrine has on Brazilian Indigenous populations:
The post UN decries erosion of Indigenous land rights in Brazil appeared first on JURIST - News.
Continue reading...
Note: We don't have any responsibilities about this news. Its been posted here by Feed Reader and we had no controls and checking on it. And because News posted here will be deleted automatically after 21 days, threads are closed so that no one spend time to post and discuss here. You can always check the source and discuss in their site.
UN Special Rapporteur on the rights of Indigenous Peoples Albert Kwokwo Barume reported that Brazil’s Senate has approved legislative decree No. 717/2024, which could “revoke the legal foundation for Indigenous land demarcation and annul the demarcation of” two Indigenous territories in Santa Catarina. The decree will suspend fundamental protections for indigenous land rights set out in previously established policy.
The legal basis for the decree is Law 14.701/2023, which sets out the “Marco Temporal Doctrine.” The doctrine “is a legal thesis…that sets a historical cutoff date for recognizing and validating indigenous land claims.” In 2023, the Supreme Federal Court ruled that the legal practice was unconstitutional. However, three months later Law 14.701/2023 reinstated the doctrine.
Greenpeace activists have castigated the legal method, stating:
Barume said that “this is the fourth time in four years” that the UN expert has “raised public alarm over this issue.” He highlighted that the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights has criticized the Marco Temporal Doctrine violates International Labour Organization Convention 169 and “contradicts the jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights.” He called on the Brazilian government to “abandon the Marco Temporal once and for all”.By questioning decisions that have already been approved and paving the way for future revocations, Bill 717/2024 threatens the present and future of many communities. It undermines the legal and institutional security of the land demarcation process, a right guaranteed through much struggle, by Article 231 of the Federal Constitution.
Barume stressed the grave human rights impact that the doctrine has on Brazilian Indigenous populations:
Decree 717 is now before the Chamber of Deputies with final provisions slated for debated by high government officials.[The Marco Temporal Doctrine]… fuels rural violence and environmental degradation. It threatens Indigenous People’s security, health and cultural practices, contributing to a slow and painful process that could lead to their extermination.
The post UN decries erosion of Indigenous land rights in Brazil appeared first on JURIST - News.
Continue reading...
Note: We don't have any responsibilities about this news. Its been posted here by Feed Reader and we had no controls and checking on it. And because News posted here will be deleted automatically after 21 days, threads are closed so that no one spend time to post and discuss here. You can always check the source and discuss in their site.