- Thread starter
- Staff
- #1
Dadparvar
Staff member
- Nov 11, 2016
- 10,590
- 0
- 6
The UK Supreme Court held Thursday that Surrey’s planning authorities acted unlawfully when granting planning permission for an oil well development in 2019. The court ruled that the authorities should have considered certain environmental impacts when making the decision.
The three-to-two decision of the five justices allowed the appeal of a previous resident of Surrey, Sarah Finch. Finch argued that Surrey County Council’s decision to grant planning permission to Horse Hill Developments failed to meet legal requirements. Under the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (EIA), an environmental impact assessment must be carried out for proposed developments to determine if they should be built. In their assessment for the Horse Hill well development, Surrey County Council failed to assess the impact of greenhouse gas emissions that would result from future use of the oil extracted from the wells. While Horse Hill Developments argued this was not a direct result and therefore was irrelevant to the impact assessment, the justices held that these environmental impacts were “inevitable,” as the oil extracted would later be burned, releasing greenhouse gases. These further emissions had not been considered when granting planning permission, and Surrey County Council had, therefore, acted unlawfully.
This case was previously heard in the High Court in 2022, where justices held that future combustion emissions were not within the scope of the EIA and that Surrey County Council had given legally valid reasons for not considering these impacts in their assessment. However, the Supreme Court disagreed with this and ruled favor of Ms. Finch.
Finch, who was acting on behalf of the environmental organization the Weald Action Group, celebrated the result of the case, stating:
The post UK Supreme Court rules oil well development unlawful appeared first on JURIST - News.
Continue reading...
Note: We don't have any responsibilities about this news. Its been posted here by Feed Reader and we had no controls and checking on it. And because News posted here will be deleted automatically after 21 days, threads are closed so that no one spend time to post and discuss here. You can always check the source and discuss in their site.
The three-to-two decision of the five justices allowed the appeal of a previous resident of Surrey, Sarah Finch. Finch argued that Surrey County Council’s decision to grant planning permission to Horse Hill Developments failed to meet legal requirements. Under the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (EIA), an environmental impact assessment must be carried out for proposed developments to determine if they should be built. In their assessment for the Horse Hill well development, Surrey County Council failed to assess the impact of greenhouse gas emissions that would result from future use of the oil extracted from the wells. While Horse Hill Developments argued this was not a direct result and therefore was irrelevant to the impact assessment, the justices held that these environmental impacts were “inevitable,” as the oil extracted would later be burned, releasing greenhouse gases. These further emissions had not been considered when granting planning permission, and Surrey County Council had, therefore, acted unlawfully.
This case was previously heard in the High Court in 2022, where justices held that future combustion emissions were not within the scope of the EIA and that Surrey County Council had given legally valid reasons for not considering these impacts in their assessment. However, the Supreme Court disagreed with this and ruled favor of Ms. Finch.
Finch, who was acting on behalf of the environmental organization the Weald Action Group, celebrated the result of the case, stating:
This case is likely to create new precedent for developers to consider in future development proposals. Environmental group Friends of the Earth, who supported Finch as an intervenor in this case, stated that “[g]oing forwards, it will be harder for fossil fuel promoters to get consent for their project.” It is thought that the UK government’s approval of a new coal mine in Cumbria in December 2022 could well be affected by this ruling.
The post UK Supreme Court rules oil well development unlawful appeared first on JURIST - News.
Continue reading...
Note: We don't have any responsibilities about this news. Its been posted here by Feed Reader and we had no controls and checking on it. And because News posted here will be deleted automatically after 21 days, threads are closed so that no one spend time to post and discuss here. You can always check the source and discuss in their site.