What's new
  • We don't have any responsibilities about the news being sent in this site. Legal News are automatically being collected from sources and submitted in this forum by feed readers. Source of each news is set in the news and a link to its source is always added.
    (Any News older than 21 days from its post time will be deleted automatically!)

Jurist UK regulator fines five payment companies over £33M each for anticompetitive behaviour

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • Thread starter
  • Staff
  • #1

Dadparvar

Staff member
Nov 11, 2016
10,601
0
6
The United Kingdom Payment Systems Regulator (PSR) Tuesday found five payment companies, Mastercard, allpay, Advanced Payment Solutions (APS), Prepaid Financial Services (PFS) and Sulion, infringed competition law by agreeing not to compete or poach each other’s customers in the UK prepaid card market.

The case concerns the issue of pre-paid cards that are used by local authorities to distribute welfare payments to vulnerable members of society, such as people facing homelessness, victims of domestic violence and asylum seekers. The only payment system that was used for pre-paid cards was Mastercard, and even for the short period Mastercard sponsored and wholly funded the National Prepaid Cards Network (Network) and had public sector members, including Mastercard program managers (PMs).

The PRS concluded that the companies were involved in two market-sharing cartels in violation of the Competition Act 1998. One was a long-term cartel between all five companies that lasted from 2012 to 2018 and the other involved APS and PFS from 2014 to 2016.

The PRS’s current decision was based on the investigation initiated against the companies in October 2017, which was followed by a complaint by allpay against one of the infringements. During the course of the investigation, the PRS also conducted unannounced searches at the premises of some of the parties.

The PRS, in its provisional findings, released in March 2021, found that five companies had an agreement that the PMs connected with different networks were not to poach each other’s public sector customers. The companies also colluded to exclusively allocate the leads from Network promotional events between the Network PMs. Lastly, the separate arrangement between APS and PFS was not to target each other’s public sector customers when a contract was up for renewal, including through a public tender.

The PRS upheld the provisional findings and imposed a fine of more than £33 million on each company for the cartel.

The post UK regulator fines five payment companies over £33M each for anticompetitive behaviour appeared first on JURIST - News.

Continue reading...

Note: We don't have any responsibilities about this news. Its been posted here by Feed Reader and we had no controls and checking on it. And because News posted here will be deleted automatically after 21 days, threads are closed so that no one spend time to post and discuss here. You can always check the source and discuss in their site.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top