- Thread starter
- Staff
- #1
Dadparvar
Staff member
- Nov 11, 2016
- 10,601
- 0
- 6
The UK’s All-Party Parliamentary Group on Democracy and the Constitution (APPGDC) released a report Wednesday, condemning UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson for “attacks” on judges and the judiciary as a whole. The APPGDC reviewed UK Supreme Court decisions, heard testimony from lawyers and judges, and reviewed public statements from Johnson and other member of his government.
The report goes on to accuse Johnson and his ministers of undermining faith in the judiciary, stating:
The report concludes by saying:
The post UK parliamentary report condemns Johnson government for attacks on judiciary appeared first on JURIST - News.
Continue reading...
Note: We don't have any responsibilities about this news. Its been posted here by Feed Reader and we had no controls and checking on it. And because News posted here will be deleted automatically after 21 days, threads are closed so that no one spend time to post and discuss here. You can always check the source and discuss in their site.
The report goes on to accuse Johnson and his ministers of undermining faith in the judiciary, stating:
The report specifically cites statements like Tory MP Geoffrey Cox’s, who was Attorney General at the time of the statements, saying “[the Supreme Court] effectively invented or created a new legal principle which hitherto had been a political convention…” in regards to a 2019 Supreme Court decision. The report also cited alleged statements through a government source saying Johnson “wants to get the judges sorted.”While ministers are, like anyone, entitled to their freedom of speech, the offices they hold come with responsibilities. These include comporting themselves in a constitutionally proper manner. It is not helpful for ministers to attack the integrity or competence of judges or to suggest that the executive has expertise or constitutional competence that it does not possess.
The report concludes by saying:
Johnson has yet to respond to the report, however, the legal counsel for the APPGDC, Sam Fowles, claims that Johnson’s Ministry of Justice refused to cooperate.The relatively high number of instances since 2020 in which the Supreme Court has departed from its previous decisions and adopted new positions which appear to fall closer into line with the executive’s political preferences may be coincidental or explained by a variety of factors….however, it creates the troubling appearance (even if it is only an appearance) of the politicisation of the judiciary.
The post UK parliamentary report condemns Johnson government for attacks on judiciary appeared first on JURIST - News.
Continue reading...
Note: We don't have any responsibilities about this news. Its been posted here by Feed Reader and we had no controls and checking on it. And because News posted here will be deleted automatically after 21 days, threads are closed so that no one spend time to post and discuss here. You can always check the source and discuss in their site.