- Thread starter
- Staff
- #1
Dadparvar
Staff member
- Nov 11, 2016
- 10,698
- 0
- 6
The Bar Council of England and Wales on Tuesday called on the government to reconsider its proposed reforms to trial by jury, which aim to scrap jury trials in cases where a convicted defendant would be jailed for up to three years, stating that the measure was an “unpopular, untested and poorly evidenced” change to the system.
In a signed letter to Prime Minister Keir Starmer, more than 3,200 lawyers, comprising a former head of the Crown Prosecution Service, retired judges, senior barristers, solicitors, and academics, echoed the wider sentiment of the legal community that jury trials are essential to a functioning democratic justice system.
The signatories further emphasized that: “Criminal law professionals continue to stretch themselves to ensure that the voices of complainants, victims and defendants are heard in court. We ask that the government now [listen] to our voices, as solicitors, barristers and recently retired judges who have evidenced measures that reduce the backlog of cases without requiring curtailing jury trials…”
The letter was penned ahead of the second reading debate of the Courts and Tribunals Bill held in Parliament on Tuesday, with figures from the government’s side, such as Justice Secretary David Lammy, arguing that the “silence of waiting” for trial is destroying the lives of victims in rape cases, which take an average of 423 days to be heard. The opposition advanced the case that juries were representative of a democratic system and suggested that the government was “gaming the system” by removing this right without a mandate.
Clauses 1 to 7 of the Courts and Tribunals Bill, which would remove the current right of an adult defendant charged with an either-way offence to elect jury trial, are integrated to address the backlog of cases in England and Wales, freeing up capacity for more serious cases to be tried by jury. Latest statistics underscore the severity of the backlog of Crown Court cases, with the Crown Court’s open caseload more than doubling since 2019 and standing at around 79,619 open cases in September 2025. Its trajectory is expected to reach 113,000 open cases in March 2029, and this has been attributed to numerous factors, such as increasingly complex criminal cases and a rise in ineffective trials.
Although the main crux of the government’s reasoning hinges upon the fact that scrapping jury trials would solve the backlog problem, research by the Institute for Government contradicts this by illustrating that judge-only trials would only reduce 2 percent of court time, if they are 20 percent faster. This endeavour has been described as “highly uncertain.”
The jury system in England is centuries old, having been formed in the 12th century and establishing the foundation of the common law system, practiced across multiple jurisdictions worldwide.
The post UK legal community urges the government to stop the bill to remove jury trials appeared first on JURIST - News.
Continue reading...
Note: We don't have any responsibilities about this news. Its been posted here by Feed Reader and we had no controls and checking on it. And because News posted here will be deleted automatically after 21 days, threads are closed so that no one spend time to post and discuss here. You can always check the source and discuss in their site.
In a signed letter to Prime Minister Keir Starmer, more than 3,200 lawyers, comprising a former head of the Crown Prosecution Service, retired judges, senior barristers, solicitors, and academics, echoed the wider sentiment of the legal community that jury trials are essential to a functioning democratic justice system.
The signatories further emphasized that: “Criminal law professionals continue to stretch themselves to ensure that the voices of complainants, victims and defendants are heard in court. We ask that the government now [listen] to our voices, as solicitors, barristers and recently retired judges who have evidenced measures that reduce the backlog of cases without requiring curtailing jury trials…”
The letter was penned ahead of the second reading debate of the Courts and Tribunals Bill held in Parliament on Tuesday, with figures from the government’s side, such as Justice Secretary David Lammy, arguing that the “silence of waiting” for trial is destroying the lives of victims in rape cases, which take an average of 423 days to be heard. The opposition advanced the case that juries were representative of a democratic system and suggested that the government was “gaming the system” by removing this right without a mandate.
Clauses 1 to 7 of the Courts and Tribunals Bill, which would remove the current right of an adult defendant charged with an either-way offence to elect jury trial, are integrated to address the backlog of cases in England and Wales, freeing up capacity for more serious cases to be tried by jury. Latest statistics underscore the severity of the backlog of Crown Court cases, with the Crown Court’s open caseload more than doubling since 2019 and standing at around 79,619 open cases in September 2025. Its trajectory is expected to reach 113,000 open cases in March 2029, and this has been attributed to numerous factors, such as increasingly complex criminal cases and a rise in ineffective trials.
Although the main crux of the government’s reasoning hinges upon the fact that scrapping jury trials would solve the backlog problem, research by the Institute for Government contradicts this by illustrating that judge-only trials would only reduce 2 percent of court time, if they are 20 percent faster. This endeavour has been described as “highly uncertain.”
The jury system in England is centuries old, having been formed in the 12th century and establishing the foundation of the common law system, practiced across multiple jurisdictions worldwide.
The post UK legal community urges the government to stop the bill to remove jury trials appeared first on JURIST - News.
Continue reading...
Note: We don't have any responsibilities about this news. Its been posted here by Feed Reader and we had no controls and checking on it. And because News posted here will be deleted automatically after 21 days, threads are closed so that no one spend time to post and discuss here. You can always check the source and discuss in their site.