- Thread starter
- Staff
- #1
Dadparvar
Staff member
- Nov 11, 2016
- 10,690
- 0
- 6
The High Court ruled Monday for the government against Liberty, a UK Civil Rights Group, in a case about government surveillance.
Liberty brought this case to challenge the Investigatory Powers Act 2016. The Act gave various agencies within the UK government broad powers to collect and retain data as well as a broad ability to execute hacking of personal devices including phones and computers. The hacking was allowed to be done en masse rather than against suspect individuals with an individual warrant. Liberty challenged this under Human Rights Act 1998, which incorporated the European Convention on Human Rights into UK Law. Specifically, Liberty alleged that there were insufficient safeguards built into the Investigatory Powers Act to prevent potential abuse.
The court reviewed all the relevant acts in question and ultimately sided with the government. The court found that Parliament had considered and expressed similar fears about abuse chose to address those in the Investigatory Powers Act through various interlocking safeguards. The court specifically cited the Investigatory Powers Commission as a body responsible for preventing abuse. The court ultimately refused to find any incompatibility between the Investigatory Powers Act and the Human Rights Act.
The post UK High Court rules for government in Investigatory Powers Act case appeared first on JURIST - News - Legal News & Commentary.
Continue reading...
Note: We don't have any responsibilities about this news. Its been posted here by Feed Reader and we had no controls and checking on it. And because News posted here will be deleted automatically after 21 days, threads are closed so that no one spend time to post and discuss here. You can always check the source and discuss in their site.
Liberty brought this case to challenge the Investigatory Powers Act 2016. The Act gave various agencies within the UK government broad powers to collect and retain data as well as a broad ability to execute hacking of personal devices including phones and computers. The hacking was allowed to be done en masse rather than against suspect individuals with an individual warrant. Liberty challenged this under Human Rights Act 1998, which incorporated the European Convention on Human Rights into UK Law. Specifically, Liberty alleged that there were insufficient safeguards built into the Investigatory Powers Act to prevent potential abuse.
The court reviewed all the relevant acts in question and ultimately sided with the government. The court found that Parliament had considered and expressed similar fears about abuse chose to address those in the Investigatory Powers Act through various interlocking safeguards. The court specifically cited the Investigatory Powers Commission as a body responsible for preventing abuse. The court ultimately refused to find any incompatibility between the Investigatory Powers Act and the Human Rights Act.
The post UK High Court rules for government in Investigatory Powers Act case appeared first on JURIST - News - Legal News & Commentary.
Continue reading...
Note: We don't have any responsibilities about this news. Its been posted here by Feed Reader and we had no controls and checking on it. And because News posted here will be deleted automatically after 21 days, threads are closed so that no one spend time to post and discuss here. You can always check the source and discuss in their site.