What's new

Welcome

If you already have an account, please login, but if you don't have one yet, you are more than welcome to freely join the community of lawyers around the world..

Register Log in
  • We don't have any responsibilities about the news being sent in this site. Legal News are automatically being collected from sources and submitted in this forum by feed readers. Source of each news is set in the news and a link to its source is always added.
    (Any News older than 21 days from its post time will be deleted automatically!)

Jurist Two Canadians sentenced for weapons possession and mischief following involvement in Alberta border blockade

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • Thread starter
  • Staff
  • #1

Dadparvar

Staff member
Nov 11, 2016
8,207
0
6
Two Canadian men, Anthony Olienick and Chris Carbert, were both sentenced to 6.5 years in prison for mischief over $5000 and possession of a weapon for the purpose of committing an offence following their arrest during the Freedom Convoy blockade at the Coutts, Alberta border crossing in 2022. The two were previously not found guilty on the most serious charge they faced, conspiring to murder a police officer, which carries a maximum sentence of life imprisonment.

Olieneck and Carbert, when arrested, were found to have live ammunition, a medical kit and ballistic vests, according to local media. Carbert argued that the weapons were to be used for hunting coyotes. The judge for the case, Justice David Labrenz, did not believe this explanation and stated:

The abundance of live ammunition, the medical kit, the ballistic vests are not supportive of showing off firearms or hunting coyotes. … They are supportive of a war with police.​
The judge was also receptive to the findings of an undercover RCMP officer in which Olienick referred to the blockade as “war,” made reference to “slitting mounty throats” and stated “they [the police] should all be hanged,” local media reports. In response to these allegations, Olieneck’s defense attorney, Marilyn Burns, argued that the RCMP used flirting to uncover these statements, something Canadian police are barred from using as a method of acquiring evidence, per local media. Within their conversations, multiple heart emojis were noted as evidence of the interactions being flirtatious. Justice Labrenz, however, found that hearts can be used for a wide variety of non-flirtatious reasons within text conversations, including acknowledgment of what the other party said in a text conversation.

The two were initially arrested following a crackdown on the Coutts border crossing blockade after local RCMP released a statement that the protest was in contravention with the Alberta Critical Infrastructure Act. Under section 2(3) of the act, it is illegal to “willfully obstruct, interrupt or interfere with the … use or operation of any essential infrastructure that renders the essential infrastructure dangerous, useless, inoperative or ineffective.”

The Coutts border blockade was part of the larger freedom convoy, a nation-wide protest that saw the blockage of multiple roadways, border crossings and other critical road infrastructure. The protest arose out of discontent with government responses to COVID-19, and which the Canadian government claims was closely connected with other illegal activity, prevented local businesses from accessing supplies and severely disrupted the flow of traffic throughout the country.

The post Two Canadians sentenced for weapons possession and mischief following involvement in Alberta border blockade appeared first on JURIST - News.

Continue reading...

Note: We don't have any responsibilities about this news. Its been posted here by Feed Reader and we had no controls and checking on it. And because News posted here will be deleted automatically after 21 days, threads are closed so that no one spend time to post and discuss here. You can always check the source and discuss in their site.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top