What's new

Welcome

If you already have an account, please login, but if you don't have one yet, you are more than welcome to freely join the community of lawyers around the world..

Register Log in
  • We don't have any responsibilities about the news being sent in this site. Legal News are automatically being collected from sources and submitted in this forum by feed readers. Source of each news is set in the news and a link to its source is always added.
    (Any News older than 21 days from its post time will be deleted automatically!)

Jurist Supreme Court rules courts can hear denials of cancellation of removal

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • Thread starter
  • Staff
  • #1

Dadparvar

Staff member
Nov 11, 2016
10,704
0
6
The US Supreme Court ruled Monday in Nasrallah v. Barr that courts can review an immigrant’s factual challenge to a denial of their application to stay deportation under the Convention Against Torture (CAT).

Under US immigration law, “noncitizens who commit certain crimes are removable from the United States.” However, during these removal proceedings, a “noncitizen who demonstrates a likelihood of torture in the designated country of removal is entitled to relief under the international Convention Against Torture and may not be removed to that country.” Accordingly, if an immigration court judge orders removal and denies CAT relief, the noncitizen may appeal both orders to the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) and then to a federal court of appeals.

However, “if the noncitizen has committed any crime specified in 8 USC § 1252(a)(2)(C),” the scope of a judicial review of the removal order is limited to constitutional and legal challenges.” This case concerned whether that scope of review for a denial of a CAT order, which is distinct from the order of removal, must also be limited to constitutional and legal challenges or if it can also include factual challenges.

The court reversed the ruling of the Eleventh Circuit in a 7-2 opinion authored by Justice Brett Kavanaugh. They held that Title §§ 1252(a)(2)(C) and (D) do not preclude judicial review of a removable noncitizen’s factual challenges to an order denying relief under the international CAT. A dissenting opinion written by Justice Clarence Thomas, who was joined by Justice Samuel Alito, argues that Congress had not empowered the courts to hear such disputes and the courts should not overreach to do so themselves.

The post Supreme Court rules courts can hear denials of cancellation of removal appeared first on JURIST - News - Legal News & Commentary.

Continue reading...

Note: We don't have any responsibilities about this news. Its been posted here by Feed Reader and we had no controls and checking on it. And because News posted here will be deleted automatically after 21 days, threads are closed so that no one spend time to post and discuss here. You can always check the source and discuss in their site.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top