- Thread starter
- Staff
- #1
Dadparvar
Staff member
- Nov 11, 2016
- 10,600
- 0
- 6
A two-judge bench of the Madras High Court ruled that the designation of a senior advocate is not an automatic right but a merit-based privilege. Dismissing the writ petition, the court Friday ruled that the designees for senior advocate positions cannot be capped at a particular percentage nor can the designation be reserved for gender considerations.
The petitioner sought, among other things, a reservation of fifty percent or one-third for women out of the total 161 candidates who had applied for the designation of the senior advocate ranks. The petitioner argued that this reservation had to be set aside when during the application process.
At the outset of the judgment, the court highlighted that the petitioner lacked standing to bring suit, given that he was neither affected by the relief he sought nor was the petition public interest litigation. This alone, according to the court was sufficient reason to dismiss the petition.
Even so, the court addressed the merits of the case with Justice M. Sundar writing the judgment. The reason underpinning the judgment of the court rested on the distinction made between a post and privilege. Relying on the provisions of the Advocates Act of 1961, the court stated that conferring the status of a senior advocate is clearly a privilege and not a post. It went on to say that any prayer for reservation is misplaced.
In the concurring judgment, Justice Sathish Kumar traced the history of the distinction of senior advocate. Sathish Kumar highlighted that the distinction’s very inception was triggered by the need to recognize merit in the profession. Sathish Kumar stated:
The post Senior advocate designation is merit-based privilege that cannot be reserved based on gender, India court rules appeared first on JURIST - News.
Continue reading...
Note: We don't have any responsibilities about this news. Its been posted here by Feed Reader and we had no controls and checking on it. And because News posted here will be deleted automatically after 21 days, threads are closed so that no one spend time to post and discuss here. You can always check the source and discuss in their site.
The petitioner sought, among other things, a reservation of fifty percent or one-third for women out of the total 161 candidates who had applied for the designation of the senior advocate ranks. The petitioner argued that this reservation had to be set aside when during the application process.
At the outset of the judgment, the court highlighted that the petitioner lacked standing to bring suit, given that he was neither affected by the relief he sought nor was the petition public interest litigation. This alone, according to the court was sufficient reason to dismiss the petition.
Even so, the court addressed the merits of the case with Justice M. Sundar writing the judgment. The reason underpinning the judgment of the court rested on the distinction made between a post and privilege. Relying on the provisions of the Advocates Act of 1961, the court stated that conferring the status of a senior advocate is clearly a privilege and not a post. It went on to say that any prayer for reservation is misplaced.
In the concurring judgment, Justice Sathish Kumar traced the history of the distinction of senior advocate. Sathish Kumar highlighted that the distinction’s very inception was triggered by the need to recognize merit in the profession. Sathish Kumar stated:
The writ petition was thus dismissed with no orders as to costs.
The post Senior advocate designation is merit-based privilege that cannot be reserved based on gender, India court rules appeared first on JURIST - News.
Continue reading...
Note: We don't have any responsibilities about this news. Its been posted here by Feed Reader and we had no controls and checking on it. And because News posted here will be deleted automatically after 21 days, threads are closed so that no one spend time to post and discuss here. You can always check the source and discuss in their site.