What's new

Welcome

If you already have an account, please login, but if you don't have one yet, you are more than welcome to freely join the community of lawyers around the world..

Register Log in
  • We don't have any responsibilities about the news being sent in this site. Legal News are automatically being collected from sources and submitted in this forum by feed readers. Source of each news is set in the news and a link to its source is always added.
    (Any News older than 21 days from its post time will be deleted automatically!)

Jurist Russia vetoes UN Security Council draft resolution on civilian protection in Sudan

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • Thread starter
  • Staff
  • #1

Dadparvar

Staff member
Nov 11, 2016
8,540
0
6
Russia vetoed a United Nations Security Council draft resolution on Monday aimed at protecting civilians in Sudan amidst the country’s ongoing conflict.

The resolution, which would have called on the warring factions to cease hostilities and engage in dialogue in good faith, was blocked despite widespread international support for its adoption. The draft resolution addressed critical concerns over the escalating humanitarian crisis in Sudan, where intense fighting between the Sudanese Armed Forces and the Rapid Support Forces has resulted in thousands of civilian casualties and mass displacement.

Russia stated that its decision to veto the resolution was based on concerns that the draft was unbalanced and did not adequately address the complexities of the Sudanese conflict. Russian representatives argued that the resolution could undermine efforts to facilitate a broader dialogue between the parties involved. Russia’s Deputy Permanent Representative Dmitry A. Polyanskiy said the following;

“The main problem with the UK draft is that it has a false understanding of who bears responsibility for the protection of civilians, and border control and security control in the country, of who should decide on inviting foreign forces in Sudan and with whom should UN officials cooperate to address existing problems. It should solely be the Government of Sudan […]. Our country will continue unfailingly to use its veto to prevent such events from happening for our African brothers.”
The veto has drawn criticism from human rights organizations and member states who view civilian protection as a cornerstone of international law. United Kingdom Foreign Secretary David Lammy stated that Russia’s veto is a ‘disgrace’ and:

“It shows to the world yet again Russia’s true colors. […]. Shame on [President Vladimir] Putin for using his mercenaries to spread conflict and violence across the African continent, and shame on Putin for pretending to be a partner of the Global South while condemning Black Africans to further killing, further rape, further starvation in a brutal war.”
The principle of civilian protection is a cornerstone of international humanitarian law, rooted in instruments such as the Geneva Conventions, which require parties to conflict to take measures to minimise harm to civilians. Advocates for the resolution have noted that its provisions were consistent with these legal obligations and aimed to provide a framework for reducing harm in Sudan’s conflict.

The situation in Sudan, which has persisted for months, has severely impacted the country’s civilian population and humanitarian infrastructure. Millions have been displaced, and access to critical aid remains limited due to ongoing hostilities. International organisations continue to express concern about the escalating crisis and the risks posed to vulnerable populations.

The post Russia vetoes UN Security Council draft resolution on civilian protection in Sudan appeared first on JURIST - News.

Continue reading...

Note: We don't have any responsibilities about this news. Its been posted here by Feed Reader and we had no controls and checking on it. And because News posted here will be deleted automatically after 21 days, threads are closed so that no one spend time to post and discuss here. You can always check the source and discuss in their site.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top