What's new

Welcome

If you already have an account, please login, but if you don't have one yet, you are more than welcome to freely join the community of lawyers around the world..

Register Log in
  • We don't have any responsibilities about the news being sent in this site. Legal News are automatically being collected from sources and submitted in this forum by feed readers. Source of each news is set in the news and a link to its source is always added.
    (Any News older than 21 days from its post time will be deleted automatically!)

Jurist Rights group hails Lebanon’s accession to the Mine Ban Treaty amidst regional conflict

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • Thread starter
  • Staff
  • #1

Dadparvar

Staff member
Nov 11, 2016
10,918
0
6
Human Rights Watch welcomed Lebanon’s accession to the Mine Ban Treaty on Wednesday. The group described it as a positive development in addressing the severe humanitarian and social crises caused by the existence of anti-personnel landmines, especially during armed conflict.

Lebanon’s accession to the Mine Ban Treaty, which was formally ratified in 1999, forbids the country to develop, produce, acquire or transfer stockpile mines in any situation. Lebanon is also expected to identify such mines and destroy them within ten years, with areas affected by such mines to be fenced and marked. Survivors should also receive adequate help, whether it be financial assistance to deal with the hefty costs of lifelong medical treatment or social and economic reintegration after such a profound loss.

In commenting on the significance of the decision, Deputy Crisis, Conflict, and Arms Director at Human Rights Watch, Verity Coyle, stated:

Lebanon’s adoption of the Mine Ban Treaty during unrelenting fighting and destruction at home and in the region is an important step toward safeguarding civilian lives, assisting mine victims, and restoring land to its communities…States that haven’t signed on should urgently follow suit.
Anti-personnel landmines, which are explosive devices designed to be detonated when in the presence, proximity or contact of a person, are prohibited internationally as they pose an indiscriminate threat and are unable to differentiate between civilians and combatants. Additionally, such devices pose a perpetual danger for generations to come, oftentimes remaining active even after a conflict has ended, threatening unsuspecting civilians with severe physical harm that frequently results in permanent, life-altering disabilities.

Having first expressed interest in ratifying the treaty in the early 2000s, the country has since remained committed to removing such dangers on its own accord, with statistics showing that over 85,000 items were destroyed within a year. However, over 23 square kilometres of land remain contaminated by anti-personnel mines and explosive remnants of war. This has led the country to accede to the treaty to eradicate the issue.

Previously, the country faced difficulty in acceding to the treaty due to long-standing national security issues, regional conflict and intense domestic political instability. The security issues stemmed from the argument that anti-personnel landmines along the southern border and the Blue Line were critical in preventing attacks from enemies. This development comes after a series of discussions, beginning in January 2026 when the Council of Ministers had approved the country’s accession, cementing it in New York on May 1.

The post Rights group hails Lebanon’s accession to the Mine Ban Treaty amidst regional conflict appeared first on JURIST - News.

Continue reading...

Note: We don't have any responsibilities about this news. Its been posted here by Feed Reader and we had no controls and checking on it. And because News posted here will be deleted automatically after 21 days, threads are closed so that no one spend time to post and discuss here. You can always check the source and discuss in their site.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top