What's new

Welcome

If you already have an account, please login, but if you don't have one yet, you are more than welcome to freely join the community of lawyers around the world..

Register Log in
  • We don't have any responsibilities about the news being sent in this site. Legal News are automatically being collected from sources and submitted in this forum by feed readers. Source of each news is set in the news and a link to its source is always added.
    (Any News older than 21 days from its post time will be deleted automatically!)

Jurist Kenya presidential candidate challenges election results in Supreme Court

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • Thread starter
  • Staff
  • #1

Dadparvar

Staff member
Nov 11, 2016
10,601
0
6
Kenyan Presidential candidate and former Prime Minister Raila Odinga filed a petition Monday with the Kenyan Supreme Court challenging the country’s 2022 presidential election results. Odinga’s challenge follows the Kenyan election regulator’s announcement last week that the current Deputy President, William Ruto, won the election.

Odinga’s petition highlights many concerns that his supporters raised after Ruto was declared the winner of the August 9 election. It also singles out Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC) Chairman Wafula Chebukati as uniquely responsible for flouting constitutional requirements by not transparently verifying the election results after they were initially counted.

According to the Kenyan Constitution’s Article 138(3)(c), “after counting the votes in the polling stations, the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission shall tally and verify the count and declare the result.” Odinga argues that the election is invalid under Kenya’s constitution because Chebukati “in isolation and by himself in contravention of Article 138(3)(c) purported to tally and verify the results leading to the final result declared. Such tallying and verification, if any, was a nullity ab initio and did not constitute compliance with The Constitution’s mandatory requirements.”

The petition also comes amid a public disagreement between the commissioners of the IEBC where four of the seven commissioners disavowed the official election results. Their concerns were based on a number of irregularities including the fact that the election results added up to 100.1% and the fact that 30 constituencies did not have their votes counted before the result was announced.

Odinga said in an earlier statement that:

The law is clear on the role of the Chairperson of the IEBC. The law does not vest in the Chairperson the powers of a dictator to rule the IEBC unilaterally. The IEBC is structured as a democratic institution in which decisions must be taken either by consensus or by a vote of the majority. The Chairperson and a tiny minority of commissioners have no legal authority to take weighty decisions and proclaim them as the rulings of the IEBC.
Neither the IEBC, Chebukati, nor Ruto has officially responded to Odinga’s petition.

Odinga’s electoral challenge mirrors a 2017 Supreme Court case where the court upheld a revote where now-Former President Uhuru Kenyatta was reelected. The court invalidated the initial 2017 results after Odinga asserted that there were irregularities in how the votes were counted.



The post Kenya presidential candidate challenges election results in Supreme Court appeared first on JURIST - News.

Continue reading...

Note: We don't have any responsibilities about this news. Its been posted here by Feed Reader and we had no controls and checking on it. And because News posted here will be deleted automatically after 21 days, threads are closed so that no one spend time to post and discuss here. You can always check the source and discuss in their site.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top