What's new

Welcome

If you already have an account, please login, but if you don't have one yet, you are more than welcome to freely join the community of lawyers around the world..

Register Log in
  • We don't have any responsibilities about the news being sent in this site. Legal News are automatically being collected from sources and submitted in this forum by feed readers. Source of each news is set in the news and a link to its source is always added.
    (Any News older than 21 days from its post time will be deleted automatically!)

Jurist Judicial review of climate regulations filed in New Zealand High Court

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • Thread starter
  • Staff
  • #1

Dadparvar

Staff member
Nov 11, 2016
10,597
0
6
A climate change advocacy group has filed an application for judicial review on Tuesday in the New Zealand High Court following claims that recent climate regulations fail to meet emissions reduction targets. Lawyers for Climate Action NZ Inc (LCANZI) filed the statement of claim against the Minister of Climate Change, claiming that the price and volume settings made under the Climate Change (Auctions, Limits, and Price Controls for Units) Amendment Regulations 2022 are incongruent with the nation’s commitments to mitigate climate change under the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS).

LCANZI claims that the Minister and Cabinet prioritised cost of living concerns above the specific emissions goals outlined in the ETS, resulting in low carbon prices. In making amendments, the Minister must ensure that the price and volume settings are made in accordance with New Zealand’s international commitments under the Paris Agreement and its goal to reach net zero emissions by 2050. The action is seeking a declaration from the High Court that the regulations are inconsistent with the Climate Change Response Act 2002, and an order to remake the regulations in accordance with the Act’s requirements.

President of LCANZI, Bronwyn Carruthers stated:

The ETS is supposed to act like a tether on our emissions. But, Cabinet signalled that whenever tension starts to go on it will throw out more rope. Unsurprisingly, the price of ETS units has collapsed following the December decision. The Minister received expert advice from the Climate Change Commission which could have resulted in ETS settings that go some way to meeting our climate change obligations. Instead, regulations were weakened, moving us further away from meeting our obligations.
The ETS requires businesses to measure and report on their greenhouse gas emissions, and requires them to surrender one “emissions unit” (NZU) to the government for each metric tonne of greenhouse gases emitted. The government sets the number of NZU’s available to businesses each year in line with emissions targets, and sets the volume and price of new NZU’s which are available at auction.

In December, New Zealand’s Climate Change Commission made several recommendations regarding the volume and price settings for the forthcoming amendments. However, the Commission’s recommendations were rejected and the settings adopted in the regulations, “[made] available at low prices an additional 35 million units over the next five years”, which is more than one year’s worth of emissions for sectors within the ETS.

The post Judicial review of climate regulations filed in New Zealand High Court appeared first on JURIST - News.

Continue reading...

Note: We don't have any responsibilities about this news. Its been posted here by Feed Reader and we had no controls and checking on it. And because News posted here will be deleted automatically after 21 days, threads are closed so that no one spend time to post and discuss here. You can always check the source and discuss in their site.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top