What's new

Welcome

If you already have an account, please login, but if you don't have one yet, you are more than welcome to freely join the community of lawyers around the world..

Register Log in
  • We don't have any responsibilities about the news being sent in this site. Legal News are automatically being collected from sources and submitted in this forum by feed readers. Source of each news is set in the news and a link to its source is always added.
    (Any News older than 21 days from its post time will be deleted automatically!)

Jurist Italy fines Apple $116 million for breach of competition-law

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • Thread starter
  • Staff
  • #1

Dadparvar

Staff member
Nov 11, 2016
10,402
0
6
Italy’s Competition Authority (AGCM) announced on Monday that it has fined Apple €98.6 million ($116 million) for imposing unfair conditions on third-party app developers through the App Tracking Transparency (ATT) policy.

This decision centers on Apple’s requirement, beginning in April 2021, that developers display an ATT consent prompt before tracking user data across apps. AGCM launched an investigation in May 2023 and ultimately determined that Apple had violated Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). AGCM found that the ATT policy created an unlawful “double consent” requirement because developers were still required to use their own consent management platform prompts to comply with European Union (EU) privacy regulations (GDPR), effectively forcing them to request the same permissions twice. In March, France fined Apple $162 million over the ATT policy, finding similar GDPR violations.

Article 102(a) of the TFEU prohibits companies holding a “dominant position within the internal market” from “directly or indirectly imposing unfair purchase or selling prices or other unfair trading conditions.” AGCM found that Apple abused its dominant position by imposing restrictive privacy rules under the ATT policy. They further asserted that Apple’s policy had been “imposed unilaterally,” and it was “detrimental to the interests of Apple’s commercial partners” and “disproportionate to the achievement of any legitimate interest.”

AGCM emphasized that it did not challenge Apple’s potential interests in adopting safeguards that protect users’ privacy, but rather it took issue with measures that are disproportionate and excessively burdensome. Importantly, the Italian Data Protection Authority (GPDP) determined that Apple could have achieved similar privacy protections through less restrictive means.

AGCM’s investigation found that reduced consent rates following ATT’s implementation had resulted in decreased advertising revenue for third-party app developers while benefiting Apple’s own advertising division, which was allowed to operate under more lenient conditions. The investigation concluded that Apple’s conduct amounted to “exploitative abuse.” In addition to the monetary fine, ACGM ordered Apple to immediately stop its anticompetitive conduct and submit a compliance report within 90 days.

This marks the latest legal development for Apple. In August, X Corp. and X.AI LLC filed a federal lawsuit alleging that Apple and OpenAI’s exclusive ChatGPT integration violates federal competition law. In April, the EU fined Apple $588 million for violating digital competition law.

While the ATT policy has drawn criticism, a working paper at the National Bureau of Economic Research shows that the policy has helped reduce financial fraud. In particular, the paper highlights that a 10 percent increase in consumers opting out of the data tracking policy translates to a 7.3 percent reduction in complaints at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.



The post Italy fines Apple $116 million for breach of competition-law appeared first on JURIST - News.

Continue reading...

Note: We don't have any responsibilities about this news. Its been posted here by Feed Reader and we had no controls and checking on it. And because News posted here will be deleted automatically after 21 days, threads are closed so that no one spend time to post and discuss here. You can always check the source and discuss in their site.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top