- Thread starter
- Staff
- #1
Dadparvar
Staff member
- Nov 11, 2016
- 8,767
- 0
- 6
Israel’s High Court of Justice on Thursday struck down a key component of a controversial 2022 law passed at the behest of National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir.
The court annulled a provision that granted the minister increased powers over the police’s investigative policies. The court emphasized that the provision could lead to a politicized police force, undermining professional standards and eroding public trust in law enforcement. Despite this annulment, aspects of the law that allow for increased oversight over police functions remain intact.
Amendment No. 37 to Israel’s Police Ordinance, known colloquially as the “Ben Gvir Law,” conferred substantial authority upon Ben Gvir to dictate police policies and priorities, including those related to investigations.
Ben Gvir expressed his discontent with the ruling, framing the decision as an affront to the authority of elected officials and contending that the court’s intervention would impede effective governance and law enforcement efforts.
The court’s ruling reflects growing concerns over the politicization of law enforcement and its implications for civil rights and democratic governance in Israel. The decision came amid a backdrop of increasing tensions within the Israeli government and widespread criticism from various quarters regarding the potential for abuse of power inherent in the amendment. Critics, including human rights organizations, argued that Ben Gvir’s directives had already resulted in intensified police actions against Palestinian citizens, exacerbating existing tensions and contributing to a climate of fear and repression. Multiple opponents to the amendment filed petitions against it, primarily arguing that it undermined democratic principles and civil rights.
The background of the ruling is rooted in the broader political landscape following the formation of Israel’s current coalition government. The amendment was part of a coalition agreement between Ben Gvir’s Otzma Yehudit Party and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s Likud Party. This partnership aimed to enhance security measures amid rising crime rates, but it has been criticized for fostering a culture of impunity and exacerbating systemic racism within policing practices.
There has been a marked increase in police actions targeting Palestinian communities since Ben Gvir assumed office, including restrictions on public expressions of Palestinian identity such as displaying flags. Reports indicate that these changes have led to heightened violence against Palestinians and a significant uptick in arrests for political expression.
The High Court’s verdict thus represents not only a legal challenge to specific governmental powers but also highlights ongoing tensions regarding governance, civil liberties, and the rule of law within Israel. The implications of this decision may resonate beyond immediate political ramifications, influencing public discourse on democracy and justice in an increasingly polarized society.
The post Israel court annuls key component of controversial police law appeared first on JURIST - News.
Continue reading...
Note: We don't have any responsibilities about this news. Its been posted here by Feed Reader and we had no controls and checking on it. And because News posted here will be deleted automatically after 21 days, threads are closed so that no one spend time to post and discuss here. You can always check the source and discuss in their site.
The court annulled a provision that granted the minister increased powers over the police’s investigative policies. The court emphasized that the provision could lead to a politicized police force, undermining professional standards and eroding public trust in law enforcement. Despite this annulment, aspects of the law that allow for increased oversight over police functions remain intact.
Amendment No. 37 to Israel’s Police Ordinance, known colloquially as the “Ben Gvir Law,” conferred substantial authority upon Ben Gvir to dictate police policies and priorities, including those related to investigations.
Ben Gvir expressed his discontent with the ruling, framing the decision as an affront to the authority of elected officials and contending that the court’s intervention would impede effective governance and law enforcement efforts.
The court’s ruling reflects growing concerns over the politicization of law enforcement and its implications for civil rights and democratic governance in Israel. The decision came amid a backdrop of increasing tensions within the Israeli government and widespread criticism from various quarters regarding the potential for abuse of power inherent in the amendment. Critics, including human rights organizations, argued that Ben Gvir’s directives had already resulted in intensified police actions against Palestinian citizens, exacerbating existing tensions and contributing to a climate of fear and repression. Multiple opponents to the amendment filed petitions against it, primarily arguing that it undermined democratic principles and civil rights.
The background of the ruling is rooted in the broader political landscape following the formation of Israel’s current coalition government. The amendment was part of a coalition agreement between Ben Gvir’s Otzma Yehudit Party and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s Likud Party. This partnership aimed to enhance security measures amid rising crime rates, but it has been criticized for fostering a culture of impunity and exacerbating systemic racism within policing practices.
There has been a marked increase in police actions targeting Palestinian communities since Ben Gvir assumed office, including restrictions on public expressions of Palestinian identity such as displaying flags. Reports indicate that these changes have led to heightened violence against Palestinians and a significant uptick in arrests for political expression.
The High Court’s verdict thus represents not only a legal challenge to specific governmental powers but also highlights ongoing tensions regarding governance, civil liberties, and the rule of law within Israel. The implications of this decision may resonate beyond immediate political ramifications, influencing public discourse on democracy and justice in an increasingly polarized society.
The post Israel court annuls key component of controversial police law appeared first on JURIST - News.
Continue reading...
Note: We don't have any responsibilities about this news. Its been posted here by Feed Reader and we had no controls and checking on it. And because News posted here will be deleted automatically after 21 days, threads are closed so that no one spend time to post and discuss here. You can always check the source and discuss in their site.