What's new

Welcome

If you already have an account, please login, but if you don't have one yet, you are more than welcome to freely join the community of lawyers around the world..

Register Log in
  • We don't have any responsibilities about the news being sent in this site. Legal News are automatically being collected from sources and submitted in this forum by feed readers. Source of each news is set in the news and a link to its source is always added.
    (Any News older than 21 days from its post time will be deleted automatically!)

Jurist India faces criticism over proposed expansion of foreign funding rights on NGOs

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • Thread starter
  • Staff
  • #1

Dadparvar

Staff member
Nov 11, 2016
10,765
0
6
Human Rights watchdog Amnesty International on Thursday warned that India’s proposed extension of restrictions on overseas funding for non-governmental organisations (NGOs) would curtail civil society space and undermine fundamental rights. Through the Foreign Contribution Bill 2026, the government seeks to expand and prolong regulatory controls under the existing Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act 2010 (FCRA) framework.

Amnesty International further stated that the proposed amendments would “restrict access to foreign funding” and exacerbate an already “punitive and restrictive environment” for NGOs operating in India. Chair of the Board at Amnesty International India, Aakar Patel, stated:

As of 26 March 2026, official data shows that 21,933 organisations had lost their FCRA licenses, depriving them of essential funds and often resulting in their closure or severe restrictions on their activities. Our research has demonstrated that those most impacted are organisations associated with minority rights, right to freedom of expression, environmental rights and climate action.​
According to official government data, over 21,000 organisations have had their FCRA registrations suspended or cancelled in recent years, significantly limiting civil society organisations and the effectiveness of their committed causes. Compliance requirements, including stringent reporting standards and administrative caps, have made it increasingly difficult for NGOs to function effectively. Concerns have also been raised about vague provisions that may allow authorities to deny funding permissions on broad or undefined grounds.

Analysis of the new bill suggests that it could further centralise control and expand government discretion in granting and revoking licenses, and impose tighter restrictions, such as prohibiting sub-granting of funds and reducing permissible administrative expenses.

The FCRA framework was scrutinised in Noel Harper v. Union of India, where the Supreme Court upheld the 2020 amendments, emphasising the state’s interest in regulating foreign contributions while acknowledging concerns about the impact on civil society.

Amnesty International previously reported that the FCRA has been used to target organisations engaged in advocacy, particularly those working on human rights and accountability issues. Similar concerns have been echoed by global philanthropic bodies, which note a chilling effect on international collaboration and funding flows.

The Indian government maintains that the FCRA is necessary to ensure transparency and prevent misuse of foreign funds. However, the cumulative effect of successive amendments has been to severely constrain the ability of NGOs to operate independently.

The post India faces criticism over proposed expansion of foreign funding rights on NGOs appeared first on JURIST - News.

Continue reading...

Note: We don't have any responsibilities about this news. Its been posted here by Feed Reader and we had no controls and checking on it. And because News posted here will be deleted automatically after 21 days, threads are closed so that no one spend time to post and discuss here. You can always check the source and discuss in their site.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top