What's new

Welcome

If you already have an account, please login, but if you don't have one yet, you are more than welcome to freely join the community of lawyers around the world..

Register Log in
  • We don't have any responsibilities about the news being sent in this site. Legal News are automatically being collected from sources and submitted in this forum by feed readers. Source of each news is set in the news and a link to its source is always added.
    (Any News older than 21 days from its post time will be deleted automatically!)

Jurist India court dismisses sedition claim against Kashmiri politician

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • Thread starter
  • Staff
  • #1

Dadparvar

Staff member
Nov 11, 2016
10,963
0
6
The Indian Supreme Court on Wednesday dismissed a civil writ petition against Dr Farooq Abdullah, a Member of the Lok Sabha (lower house of Parliament) from the Jammu & Kashmir National Conference party and a former Chief Minister of the erstwhile state of Jammu & Kashmir. The petition had made a plea for terminating the senior politician’s Lok Sabha membership and asked that the court proceed against him for sedition under Section 124A of the Indian Penal Code.

Abdullah was taken to court for his statement on the abrogation of Article 370 of the Indian Constitution where he was alleged to have publicly stated that he would take help from China to restore the status of Article 370 in Kashmir. The petition alleged that Abdullah was trying to “hand over” Kashmir to either China or Pakistan because it was common knowledge that “there are only two countries in the world which are trying to grab the Indian part of Indian territories.”

The apex court’s bench, comprising Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hemant Gupta, dismissed the case for failing to substantiate its allegations and reiterated its position on Indian sedition law, holding that:

The expression of a view which is a dissent from a decision taken by the Central Government itself cannot be said to be seditious. There is nothing in the statement which we find so offensive as to give a cause of action for a Court to initiate proceedings.
It also reprimanded the petitioners for filing a case when they have no relation to the subject matter and imposed costs of Rs. 50,000 ($684) to “discourage such endeavours.” The fine is to be deposited in four weeks with the Supreme Court Advocates Welfare Fund, which was established under Advocates’ Welfare Fund Act of 2001 to “financially assist the indigent, disabled and other advocates.”

Farooq Abdullah, a five-time elected Chief Minister of Jammu & Kashmir, was among the regional leaders placed under house arrest for seven months as part of preventive detention under the J&K Public Safety Act.

The post India court dismisses sedition claim against Kashmiri politician appeared first on JURIST - News - Legal News & Commentary.

Continue reading...

Note: We don't have any responsibilities about this news. Its been posted here by Feed Reader and we had no controls and checking on it. And because News posted here will be deleted automatically after 21 days, threads are closed so that no one spend time to post and discuss here. You can always check the source and discuss in their site.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top