- Thread starter
- Staff
- #1
Dadparvar
Staff member
- Nov 11, 2016
- 9,692
- 0
- 6
The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) condemned judicial decisions in Brazil that could exclude criminal responsibility in cases of sexual violence against girls and adolescents.
The statement follows an alarming two-year trend in which protections for children under the age of 14 have reportedly weakened. This is highlighted by four controversial rulings from Brazil’s Superior Court of Justice (STJ) that may limit criminal accountability in instances of sexual violence against minors. Collectively, the rulings introduced exceptions to the absolute presumption of non-consent in cases of sexual violence, considering mitigating circumstances such as the sexual abuser having reached the age of 18, entering marriage or the victim falling pregnant.
These legal decisions reflect a broader regression in the country’s commitment to upholding international law, particularly its binding obligations under Article 34 of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC). This convention mandates state parties to take appropriate measures in preventing the exploitation of children in unlawful sexual practices. The STJ’s rulings also conflict with the Belém do Pará Convention. The landmark international framework was adopted in 1994 to address the issue of violence against women. The STJ’s non-adherence to Article 7 (b) of the Belém do Pará Convention, which requires states to pursue cases of violence against women with due diligence, is concerning for the IACHR, especially given the STJ’s reaffirmation of this interpretative approach on April 3, 2025.
Official statistics indicate that 822,000 rapes occur annually in Brazil, nearly half of which involve girls between the ages of 10 to 14. The judiciary’s failure to uphold strong protections for minors in such cases only adds to an erosion in the human rights landscape in Brazil. The STJ’s jurisprudence demonstrate a persistence of gendered stereotypes and victim-blaming logic narratives. The IACHR’s statement is timely amid growing outcry from human rights organizations regarding the lack of implementation of decisions from international and regional human rights institutions regarding sexual and reproductive rights in Latin American countries.
In particular, Brazil’s systematic non-compliance with General Recommendation No.35 of the United Nations Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW), which enshrines the obligation of courts to consider the power imbalances inherent in cases of sexual violence raises concerns about the country’s failure to ensure a responsive justice system. It is recommended that Brazil’s judicial authorities reconsider legal interpretations that weaken legal protections for children and ensure that discourse on close-in-age exceptions in the absence of abuse of power is answered under the framework of juvenile justice.
The post IACHR expresses concern over Brazil rulings exempting liability in sexual violence cases involving minors appeared first on JURIST - News.
Continue reading...
Note: We don't have any responsibilities about this news. Its been posted here by Feed Reader and we had no controls and checking on it. And because News posted here will be deleted automatically after 21 days, threads are closed so that no one spend time to post and discuss here. You can always check the source and discuss in their site.
The statement follows an alarming two-year trend in which protections for children under the age of 14 have reportedly weakened. This is highlighted by four controversial rulings from Brazil’s Superior Court of Justice (STJ) that may limit criminal accountability in instances of sexual violence against minors. Collectively, the rulings introduced exceptions to the absolute presumption of non-consent in cases of sexual violence, considering mitigating circumstances such as the sexual abuser having reached the age of 18, entering marriage or the victim falling pregnant.
These legal decisions reflect a broader regression in the country’s commitment to upholding international law, particularly its binding obligations under Article 34 of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC). This convention mandates state parties to take appropriate measures in preventing the exploitation of children in unlawful sexual practices. The STJ’s rulings also conflict with the Belém do Pará Convention. The landmark international framework was adopted in 1994 to address the issue of violence against women. The STJ’s non-adherence to Article 7 (b) of the Belém do Pará Convention, which requires states to pursue cases of violence against women with due diligence, is concerning for the IACHR, especially given the STJ’s reaffirmation of this interpretative approach on April 3, 2025.
Official statistics indicate that 822,000 rapes occur annually in Brazil, nearly half of which involve girls between the ages of 10 to 14. The judiciary’s failure to uphold strong protections for minors in such cases only adds to an erosion in the human rights landscape in Brazil. The STJ’s jurisprudence demonstrate a persistence of gendered stereotypes and victim-blaming logic narratives. The IACHR’s statement is timely amid growing outcry from human rights organizations regarding the lack of implementation of decisions from international and regional human rights institutions regarding sexual and reproductive rights in Latin American countries.
In particular, Brazil’s systematic non-compliance with General Recommendation No.35 of the United Nations Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW), which enshrines the obligation of courts to consider the power imbalances inherent in cases of sexual violence raises concerns about the country’s failure to ensure a responsive justice system. It is recommended that Brazil’s judicial authorities reconsider legal interpretations that weaken legal protections for children and ensure that discourse on close-in-age exceptions in the absence of abuse of power is answered under the framework of juvenile justice.
The post IACHR expresses concern over Brazil rulings exempting liability in sexual violence cases involving minors appeared first on JURIST - News.
Continue reading...
Note: We don't have any responsibilities about this news. Its been posted here by Feed Reader and we had no controls and checking on it. And because News posted here will be deleted automatically after 21 days, threads are closed so that no one spend time to post and discuss here. You can always check the source and discuss in their site.