What's new

Welcome

If you already have an account, please login, but if you don't have one yet, you are more than welcome to freely join the community of lawyers around the world..

Register Log in
  • We don't have any responsibilities about the news being sent in this site. Legal News are automatically being collected from sources and submitted in this forum by feed readers. Source of each news is set in the news and a link to its source is always added.
    (Any News older than 21 days from its post time will be deleted automatically!)

Jurist HRW claims detonating communication devices violates international law following Lebanon explosions

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • Thread starter
  • Staff
  • #1

Dadparvar

Staff member
Nov 11, 2016
8,207
0
6
Human Rights Watch (HRW) stated on Wednesday that the simultaneous detonation of thousands of communication devices across Lebanon and Syria violated customary international law. Thousands of pagers exploded on Tuesday, killing 12 and injuring more than 2,000 people. Walkie-talkie explosions on Wednesday killed an additional 25 and injured at least 600. The devices are alleged to be part of the Hezbollah communication network. Israel is suspected to be behind the explosions but has not commented.

According to HRW, the targeting of the communication devices violated Rule 80 of International Humanitarian Law. The rule prohibits the use of booby traps attached to objects likely to attract civilians or are “objects in normal civilian daily use.”

HRW also stated that the detonation of the devices “whose exact location could not be reliably known” was “unlawfully indiscriminate” as both military and civilian populations were targeted “without distinction.” The Law of Proportionality requires that attacks that may injure or kill civilians must not be excessive “in relation to the concrete and direct overall military advantage anticipated.”

In addition to customary humanitarian law, several international protocols protect civilians from attack. Additional Protocols I and II to the Geneva Convention of 1949 protect civilian populations from the “object of attack.” Furthermore, both protocols prohibit “[a]cts or threats of violence the primary purpose of which is to spread terror among the civilian population.” Both Additional Protocol I and II contain exceptions for civilians “tak[ing] a direct part in hostilities.” Neither offers a concise definition or test for what constitutes a “direct part in hostilities.” Israel is not a party to either protocol.

The explosions are the latest in a series of escalations between Israel and Hezbollah in Lebanon. Tensions stem from the Israel-Gaza War in which both sides have been accused of war crimes.

The post HRW claims detonating communication devices violates international law following Lebanon explosions appeared first on JURIST - News.

Continue reading...

Note: We don't have any responsibilities about this news. Its been posted here by Feed Reader and we had no controls and checking on it. And because News posted here will be deleted automatically after 21 days, threads are closed so that no one spend time to post and discuss here. You can always check the source and discuss in their site.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top