- Thread starter
- Staff
- #1
Dadparvar
Staff member
- Nov 11, 2016
- 10,715
- 0
- 6
Hong Kong’s Court of Final Appeal revoked media tycoon Jimmy Lai’s bail on Thursday, seeing his return to custody until February at the earliest.
The ruling comes only a week after Lai was granted bail by the High Court on a number of stringent terms, including that he pay HK$10 million and refrain from posting on social media.
Lai, a pro-democracy activist, was charged in early December with one count of fraud and another for “collusion with a foreign country or with external elements to endanger national security” under Article 29(4) of Hong Kong’s new national security law. The controversial law came into force on June 30, 2020, with the purpose of “preventing, suppressing and imposing punishment for the offences of secession, subversion, organisation and perpetration of terrorist activities, and collusion with a foreign country or with external elements to endanger national security.”
In its determination, the court held that it was “reasonably arguable … that the learned judge may have erred in his construction or application” of Article 42(2) of the national security law, under which bail can only be granted to a criminal defendant if a judge has sufficient grounds to believe that the defendant will not commit acts endangering national security. Justice Alex Lee of the High Court had previously considered that what the prosecution alleged to be “requests” to foreign powers, forbidden under Article 29(4), were rather “comments and criticisms … albeit one might find those views disagreeable or even offensive.”
Lai will remain in custody, pending a hearing on February 1, 2021.
The post Hong Kong pro-democracy tycoon returns to custody after top court revokes bail appeared first on JURIST - News - Legal News & Commentary.
Continue reading...
Note: We don't have any responsibilities about this news. Its been posted here by Feed Reader and we had no controls and checking on it. And because News posted here will be deleted automatically after 21 days, threads are closed so that no one spend time to post and discuss here. You can always check the source and discuss in their site.
The ruling comes only a week after Lai was granted bail by the High Court on a number of stringent terms, including that he pay HK$10 million and refrain from posting on social media.
Lai, a pro-democracy activist, was charged in early December with one count of fraud and another for “collusion with a foreign country or with external elements to endanger national security” under Article 29(4) of Hong Kong’s new national security law. The controversial law came into force on June 30, 2020, with the purpose of “preventing, suppressing and imposing punishment for the offences of secession, subversion, organisation and perpetration of terrorist activities, and collusion with a foreign country or with external elements to endanger national security.”
In its determination, the court held that it was “reasonably arguable … that the learned judge may have erred in his construction or application” of Article 42(2) of the national security law, under which bail can only be granted to a criminal defendant if a judge has sufficient grounds to believe that the defendant will not commit acts endangering national security. Justice Alex Lee of the High Court had previously considered that what the prosecution alleged to be “requests” to foreign powers, forbidden under Article 29(4), were rather “comments and criticisms … albeit one might find those views disagreeable or even offensive.”
Lai will remain in custody, pending a hearing on February 1, 2021.
The post Hong Kong pro-democracy tycoon returns to custody after top court revokes bail appeared first on JURIST - News - Legal News & Commentary.
Continue reading...
Note: We don't have any responsibilities about this news. Its been posted here by Feed Reader and we had no controls and checking on it. And because News posted here will be deleted automatically after 21 days, threads are closed so that no one spend time to post and discuss here. You can always check the source and discuss in their site.