What's new

Welcome

If you already have an account, please login, but if you don't have one yet, you are more than welcome to freely join the community of lawyers around the world..

Register Log in
  • We don't have any responsibilities about the news being sent in this site. Legal News are automatically being collected from sources and submitted in this forum by feed readers. Source of each news is set in the news and a link to its source is always added.
    (Any News older than 21 days from its post time will be deleted automatically!)

Jurist Hong Kong court quashes conviction of award-winning journalist

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • Thread starter
  • Staff
  • #1

Dadparvar

Staff member
Nov 11, 2016
6,889
0
6
The Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal quashed the conviction of journalist Choi Yuk-ling on Monday regarding her investigation into the 2019 Yuen Long attack. The court unanimously quashed Choi’s conviction by adopting a more liberal approach, which took into account Choi’s journalistic background. The court contended that the liberal approach is preferable to protect the freedom of press. Another ground for quashing the conviction was that the lower courts had drawn inferences that caused substantial and grave injustices to Choi.

The prosecution charged Choi with two counts of knowingly making a false statement for the purpose of obtaining a certificate under the local traffic laws. In Hong Kong, members of the public can apply to the Commissioner for Transport to obtain a certificate of the particulars. The application process requires applicants to declare their purposes for obtaining certificates. With limited choices on the drop down menu, Choi declared that she obtained the certificate “for traffic and transport-related matters.” The prosecution argued, however, that Choi breached the law because a journalistic investigation was not included in her reasoning for obtaining the certificate. The lower courts accepted this argument and found Choi guilty.

The Court of Final Appeal held that the construction of the quoted term should include journalism in good faith. Adopting a more lenient approach can give effect to the freedom of press, as provided in the Hong Kong Basic Law and the Bill of Rights. The court also ruled that the terms “for traffic and transport-related matters” is unclear and ambiguous. The court also said that inferring that Choi had knowledge of the falsity in her declaration has caused substantial and grave injustice in support of quashing Choi’s conviction.

The reason Choi applied for the certificate was to further her investigation for a television documentary, “Hong Kong Connection, 7 21 Who Owns the Truth,” which was released in 2021. The documentary covers the violence that happened in Yuen Long in 2019 during an anti-extradition law amendment bill movement. In the case involving the events, the defendants told the court that the attack intended to target protesters.

The post Hong Kong court quashes conviction of award-winning journalist appeared first on JURIST - News.

Continue reading...

Note: We don't have any responsibilities about this news. Its been posted here by Feed Reader and we had no controls and checking on it. And because News posted here will be deleted automatically after 21 days, threads are closed so that no one spend time to post and discuss here. You can always check the source and discuss in their site.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top