What's new

Welcome

If you already have an account, please login, but if you don't have one yet, you are more than welcome to freely join the community of lawyers around the world..

Register Log in
  • We don't have any responsibilities about the news being sent in this site. Legal News are automatically being collected from sources and submitted in this forum by feed readers. Source of each news is set in the news and a link to its source is always added.
    (Any News older than 21 days from its post time will be deleted automatically!)

Jurist Federal appeals court strikes down Arkansas law barring state contracts with companies that boycott Israel

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • Thread starter
  • Staff
  • #1

Dadparvar

Staff member
Nov 11, 2016
10,717
0
6
The US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit ruled Friday that an Arkansas law prohibiting state contracts with companies that refuse to pledge against boycotts on Israel is an unconstitutional violation of the First and Fourteenth Amendments.

The 2017 law prevented contractors from signing deals with the state unless they agreed to abstain from boycotts against Israel. Contractors could avoid this obligation by offering services at a 20-percent discount.

The Arkansas Times printed advertisements for a local technical college for many years. The school was incorporated into the University of Arkansas System in 2017. When the Times tried to renew their contract with the college, they were asked to sign the Israel anti-boycott pledge in order to continue doing business. They refused, claiming the policy was a violation of their freedom of speech. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) filed a lawsuit on their behalf.

Arkansas argued that boycotts are not protected under the First Amendment because they are “all but invisible absent explanatory speech” and thus not considered expressive content. They also claimed that the law only prohibited an “economic boycott,” which is not constitutionally protected.

In a 2-1 split, the panel of three judges declared the law was overly broad, focusing on a phrase in the law that prohibits companies contracting with the state from engaging in boycotts “or other actions.” The court agreed that, while the state could prohibit economic boycotts that do not constitute free speech, the restrictions on “other actions” violated the newspaper’s First Amendment rights by preventing contractors “from engaging in boycott activity outside the scope of the contractual relationship “on its own time and dime.”

The case was remanded to the district court, where it had previously been dismissed. Twenty-six other states have similar laws in place, several of which have also been challenged by the ACLU.

The post Federal appeals court strikes down Arkansas law barring state contracts with companies that boycott Israel appeared first on JURIST - News - Legal News & Commentary.

Continue reading...

Note: We don't have any responsibilities about this news. Its been posted here by Feed Reader and we had no controls and checking on it. And because News posted here will be deleted automatically after 21 days, threads are closed so that no one spend time to post and discuss here. You can always check the source and discuss in their site.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top