What's new

Welcome

If you already have an account, please login, but if you don't have one yet, you are more than welcome to freely join the community of lawyers around the world..

Register Log in
  • We don't have any responsibilities about the news being sent in this site. Legal News are automatically being collected from sources and submitted in this forum by feed readers. Source of each news is set in the news and a link to its source is always added.
    (Any News older than 21 days from its post time will be deleted automatically!)

Jurist EU Court of Justice rules against ‘general and indiscriminate’ data retention by police

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • Thread starter
  • Staff
  • #1

Dadparvar

Staff member
Nov 11, 2016
10,601
0
6
The Court of Justice of the European Union (EU) Tuesday ruled that national governments may not permit the “general and indiscriminate retention” of traffic and location data of electronic communications.

The court’s ruling comes from a long procedural history. In 2015, an Irish court convicted Graham Dwyer of the 2012 murder of Elaine O’Hara. Dwyer appealed to the Irish Court of Appeal and argued that traffic and location data of his phone calls were improperly admitted as evidence at trial. Dwyer separately initiated a civil action in Ireland’s High Court challenging a 2011 Irish data law on the basis that it violated EU law. The High Court ruled for Dwyer, and prosecutors appealed to the Irish Supreme Court. The Irish Supreme Court then referred the question to the Court of Justice.

The court found that settled EU law “enshrines” a guiding principle prohibiting retention of traffic and location data of electronic communications. This principle is part of the fundamental right of EU citizens to “the respect for private life and the protection of personal data.”

Members of the court acknowledged that, based on prior case law, member state legislatures may allow limited data storage in specific cases for “the purposes of combating serious crime and preventing serious threats to public security.” These narrow exceptions include:

the targeted retention of traffic and location data which is limited, according to the categories of persons concerned or using a geographical criterion; the general and indiscriminate retention of IP addresses assigned to the source of an internet connection; the general and indiscriminate retention of data relating to the civil identity of users of electronic communications systems; and the expedited retention (quick freeze) of traffic and location data in the possession of those service providers.
The exact effect of the court’s ruling on Dwyer’s case is unclear. In a statement, Irish Minister for Justice Helen McEntee said, “[t]he case will now revert to the Supreme Court and the Department of Justice will consider, together with the Attorney General’s Office, the judgment of the Supreme Court when the case is finalised.”



The post EU Court of Justice rules against ‘general and indiscriminate’ data retention by police appeared first on JURIST - News.

Continue reading...

Note: We don't have any responsibilities about this news. Its been posted here by Feed Reader and we had no controls and checking on it. And because News posted here will be deleted automatically after 21 days, threads are closed so that no one spend time to post and discuss here. You can always check the source and discuss in their site.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top