What's new

Welcome

If you already have an account, please login, but if you don't have one yet, you are more than welcome to freely join the community of lawyers around the world..

Register Log in
  • We don't have any responsibilities about the news being sent in this site. Legal News are automatically being collected from sources and submitted in this forum by feed readers. Source of each news is set in the news and a link to its source is always added.
    (Any News older than 21 days from its post time will be deleted automatically!)

Jurist ECHR hears two landmark climate change cases

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • Thread starter
  • Staff
  • #1

Dadparvar

Staff member
Nov 11, 2016
10,597
0
6
The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) Wednesday heard oral arguments in two cases in which the applicants are accusing their respective governments, France and Switzerland, of failing to take steps to prevent climate change. Both applicants argue that this failure entails a breach of their right to life and right to respect for family life under the European Convention of Human Rights.

The members of Verein KlimaSeniorinnen Schweiz, a Swiss association, are the applicants in the first case. The members are a group of older women, with 33 percent being over the age of 75. They are concerned about the consequences of global warming on their living conditions and health. The particular vulnerability they allege is the exacerbation of health problems during global warming-induced heatwaves. The members allege that the government of Switzerland has failed to introduce suitable legislation to meet international targets for tackling climate change. Furthermore, they argue that they have not had access to a court and that there is no effective domestic remedy.

Mr. Damien Carême, a former French mayor, is taking the second case. Carême is challenging the French court’s assertion that he is not directly affected by the country’s failure to take sufficient action on climate change. He alleges that he is directly affected by this failure due to the increased risk that his home might be affected in the years to come, namely through flooding. He suggests that the failure is already having a negative effect, in particular by not allowing him to plan his life peacefully there.

The Swiss government and the French government have similar standpoints. They contend that because they are not solely responsible for climate change, they cannot be held accountable for its effects.

The judgements of the ECHR could set pivotal precedence in respect of future climate change actions. The court is expected to make its ruling on both matters in 2024.

The post ECHR hears two landmark climate change cases appeared first on JURIST - News.

Continue reading...

Note: We don't have any responsibilities about this news. Its been posted here by Feed Reader and we had no controls and checking on it. And because News posted here will be deleted automatically after 21 days, threads are closed so that no one spend time to post and discuss here. You can always check the source and discuss in their site.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top